Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/27/2010 7:01:13 AM PST by Dominic L. Fottfoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dominic L. Fottfoy

I’m no engineer, but isn’t 72,000 systems delivering 724 megawatts a bad return on investment ?


2 posted on 12/27/2010 7:08:07 AM PST by knarf (Who's Holi ? - Christ I know, you obviously don't - let me tell you about him - Romans 10:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy

Solar is the solution to a problem that does not exist.


4 posted on 12/27/2010 7:11:08 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy

“There are too many incentives, financial and otherwise..”

####

“Financial incentives” are made possible ONLY by the government STEALING from more effficient, productive areas of the economy.

What is this “otherwise”? The fact that sunlight is a free gift from God?


7 posted on 12/27/2010 7:17:11 AM PST by EyeGuy (RaceMarxist Obama: The Politics of Vengeance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy

You can go broke saving money on solar electricity.

Without “other people’s money” solar is a bad deal.

From the article—

“”The California Public Utilities Commission has $3.3 billion available to offer incentives to those who install solar power for commercial operations. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 also offers tax incentives for renewable energy projects, including solar.””

and this quote is even better-—

“”Maring was reluctant to discuss details of Del Mar’s specific rebate/incentive/tax payback scenario, but it is obvious the ultimate cash outlay is significantly less than the purchase cost.

“It is pretty complicated and involves income tax brackets, incentives, depreciation and rebates from energy companies,” he says.””


8 posted on 12/27/2010 7:19:05 AM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy

California’s state debt is what again? /s =.=


10 posted on 12/27/2010 7:26:36 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy
1 nuclear reactor can produce more energy than all of these solar panels put together. Best part is they also work at night.

http://www.energy.ca.gov/nuclear/california.html (Scroll to bottom for table)

12 posted on 12/27/2010 7:45:32 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy

Solar energy ... for AGRICULTURE?! WOW! What a great idea! California is indeed a world leader in technology. Next thing you know, they’ll be using pipes to carry WATER!


13 posted on 12/27/2010 8:16:49 AM PST by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy

But, but, but didn’t Maggie Thatcher once say that, “The problem with subsidizing solar energy is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money for solar subsidies?”


14 posted on 12/27/2010 8:19:50 AM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy

The Dems & Enviro’s have halted development of 2 of the largest proposed solar sites. One in the Mojave Desert, the other in the Imperial Valley.


15 posted on 12/27/2010 8:20:37 AM PST by G Larry (When you're right, avoid compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy
Solar Industry Claims Its So Successful That It Needs Corporate Welfare to Survive
17 posted on 12/27/2010 8:43:27 AM PST by epithermal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dominic L. Fottfoy
Think about that for a moment. You have 72,000 individual systems running all over the state. The power is not "dispatchable" meaning you cannot control when it is available to meet demand requirements. The individual systems are not controlled as a single large system. And what do you suppose are the logistical problems of maintaining 72,000 separate systems spread all over 156,000 square miles?

Now ponder the fact that a SINGLE medium size fossil fuel fired generating UNIT would produce that same amount of power 24 hours a day and the power can be turned up and down on demand. Plus, it doesn't go to "sleep" when the sun doesn't shine. Remember, I am talking about a single generating unit, not an entire power plant comprised of multiple units.

Even if you are not a power engineer, which one do you think makes the most sense?

21 posted on 12/27/2010 9:53:14 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson