[Seven plus One]

Huh?

[FlingWingFlyer]

What is this guy’s “claim to fame”? Recently graduating from High School? I’ve never heard of him. Appearing with Nora O’Donnell on PMSNBC doesn’t impress me.

[narses]

IBTZ

[FrankR]

Actually, I think ol' Ezra is getting just what he wanted...fifteen minutes of attention..

[Clint Lippo]

IBTZ no.2

[Admin Moderator]

[rollo tomasi]

"...smart scholars of good faith continue to disagree about it."

Good faith my a$$, they deconstruct the Constitution in order to promote their self-interests.

[tumblindice]

In after Ezra and Ryan relegated to:
http://www.rathergood.com/gaybar

[silentreignofheroes]

“despite the confidence various people have in their interpretation of the text, smart scholars of good faith continue to disagree about it.”

Us Idiots and them there smart folks.

Happy New Year People,,The 2nd keeps us 1st

[cripplecreek]

This is the guy that admits liberals are too stupid to understand the constitution.

[radpolis]

If there is one thing I know for certain in this world is that we conservatives have conceded to much to the left.

They control the conversation of the national discourse, because we have conceded the media, the academy and the law schools to them.

THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND.

What has happened is we have allowed left-wing kooks to twist the meaning of the US Constitution to suit their nefarious political agenda.

When it comes to the plain meaning of the US Constitution and original intent, we conservatives are on the right side every time. We are on the rational side. We understand the political theory that gave birth to the US Constitution.

There is no reasonable debate over its meaning.

We believe in what the Constitution says and we believe in the genius of the Founding Fathers.

We understand the corrupt and totalitarian nature of state power.

Liberals believe in one ideological father: Karl Marx.

They despise everything the US Constitution stands for because it didn’t emanate from the ideas of their father.

[Da Coyote]

Astute?

Just beclowned yourselves, MSM.

I’m sooo glad I went to a real college.

Try it sometimes.

[Retain Mike]

He has thrown a high hanging curve ball for all the talk show hosts who return on Monday. With just a modicum of scholarship, these people should be able to destroy him. They should be able to contrast the inherent natural rights embodied in the Constitution, with the refusal to understand the document based on it being in conflict with various theories espoused to justify oligarchy or totalitarianism.

[Jet Jaguar]

[FlyingEagle]

IBTZ

[Jet Jaguar]

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

IBTZ

Good bye Ryan!

[Oceander]

The Constitution was written more than 223 years ago, and despite the confidence various people have in their interpretation of the text, smart scholars of good faith continue to disagree about it.

What a stupid, moronic, liberal, thing to say. Notice his cutesy little (liberal) rhetorical move: he doesn't characterize the sort of "disagreement" these so-called "smart scholars" have about the Constitution. Why? Because most smart scholars of the Constitution do not have a whole lot of disagreement over the meaning of the Constitution - they have arguments, mostly along the lines of "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin," that involve mostly moot or academic points, and they have some disagreements over just how far the scope of a particular provision might go, but they generally do not have much disagreement over the core interpretation of the Constitution.
To update that old canard about lies and statistics, there are lies, there are damned lies, there are statistics, and then there are liberals.

[Free in Texas]

He died with his Jimmy Choo’s on.

[Qbert]

“After all, we do have amendments for a reason”

—Wow! You mean these amendment-thingies are there for a purpose? Who woulda thunk it??

Silly me, I thought unelected activist judges were simply supposed to declare whatever they want the law of the land to be...