[skeeter]

That case also clearly spells out the working definition of ‘subject to the jurisdiction of’, and that definition doesn’t in any way support your interpretation of the 14th.

[Lurking Libertarian]

That case also clearly spells out the working definition of ‘subject to the jurisdiction of’, and that definition doesn’t in any way support your interpretation of the 14th.

Oh, really? The Court said,"Every citizen or subject of another country, while domiciled here, is within the allegiance and the protection, and consequently subject to the jurisdiction, of the United States."