Strunk v Paterson (Obama)-1st time since 1824 Judge has opined what NBC is. Concludes Obama not NBC.

obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ^ | 1/18/2011 | ObamaRelease YourRecords

[curiosity]

Ummmm Un-curios, that was a 1952 citizen statute that only applied to Obama if he was born overseas and his mother was too young to pass on her US citizenship. That particular federal statute would not effect Obama if he was born in Hawaii.

You are correct about the 1952 law. However, Citizen Wells was confused. He thought it applied even to children born within the US, and that was the premise of his argument.

He was, of course, wrong, but he was most emphatically, NOT making any claims about two citizen parents being required for NBC.

Again this argument is a clownish sideshow as I have pointed out.

You'll get no argument from me there. Your statement above applies to all birther arguments.

[El Sordo]

Not yet anyway.

[El Sordo]

Well, good luck to you.

[Lurking Libertarian]

Strunk, who is not a lawyer and is representing himself, asked the court for leave to file an amended complaint. The court denied that motion and dismissed his original complaint. Strunk can say all he wants that he is going to file an amended complaint, but the judge already ruled that he can’t. He can file his amended complaint in the courthouse, but the judge will throw it out. Strunk has to take this up with the appellate court.

[charlene4]

Did any of you who think that daddy;s country of origin was not disscussed before election ever hear of Phil berg and his site ObamaCRIMES? I believe Phil was well aware and there were many of us there back inJuly or August discussing the Kenyan daddy and the Indonesian issue.....

[PhillyPatriot1]

I just wanted to let you know that this link http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html
no longer goes to the fight the smears disclosure. It goes to the DNC page that is giving credence to the recently released long form birth certificate. Do you have a link to a screen shot of what the fight the smears site said? Maybe you can replace the current link with the one of a screen shot.

[allmendream]

Brilliant work. The birthers crow they have to eat doesn't get any fresher - but they refuse to even take a bite of the OBVIOUS error you have served up to them.

This is a brilliant argument in miniature of the entire birther saga.

Delusion, wishful thinking, animosity, attempt at groupthought enforcement, revisionist history, shoddy scholarship - and a total inability to ever admit they were wrong on even the smallest point!