Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Raquel
“Kim’s objection to the pledge, she says, is that the ideals it speaks of are not reality, specifically its conclusion, which says “with liberty and justice for all.” Kim says the nation is just not there yet.”

Okay, so because we are "not there yet" you have decided the quest is not worth undertaking? That's one lame-a$$ reason for NOT reciting the Pledge of Allegience.

It seems to me that any decent person who believed we are "not there yet" would undertake to re-double his/her efforts to get us there -- IF he/she genuinely cared about the ideals in question, that is. And THAT'S the crux of it, right there, Ms. Kim, isn't it? YOU don't really believe in or care about the ideals and principles upon which this country was founded, do you?

8 posted on 01/28/2011 9:28:04 AM PST by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WayneS

You beat to the obvious. So, by your refusal, you’re saying that you are against liberty and justice for all?


13 posted on 01/28/2011 9:40:50 AM PST by CIDKauf (No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: WayneS

It’s true, there is no liberty and justice for all, here. I think of the unborn. Where is their liberty and justice?

My solution, though, is not to dramatically avoid the pledge, but rather to work to make it more of a reality.


16 posted on 01/28/2011 10:05:29 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson