Posted on 02/09/2011 7:03:35 AM PST by therightliveswithus
Not the point, if you can understand the fact that the media attacked candidates who may be problem later to them Can you imagine if she had won? They would go ballistic. Now as far as being electable, no candidate would have beaten that marxist. Stop the attack of anyone who had no shot at winning. Find winning candidates.
I suppose that you were convinced of that by the LSM.
As long as you continue to let the liberal media tell you who is electable and who isn't, the RATS will survive.
Yep, although she wasn’t so much a target as an opportunity. They didn’t “target” her because they wanted to defeat her — they were sure of that.
They made her the national face of the tea party movement, in the hopes of turning around the national election. They used her as the generic bogeyman, to shut down Angle, Buck, Rease, Toomey, and Fiorina.
They succeeded in most cases, Toomey managed to hang on but acknowledged the difficulty posed by the white house strategy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.