Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: manc
a little melodramatic aren’t you, I would expect that off homosexuals but come on this is a conservative site socially and fiscal.

You're implying I'M homosexual? If so, you haven't a clue, son. I like women. I've been married to a particular woman for 23 years. And I plan to stay that way.

I know FR is a conservative site. That is why I am here.

That has absolutely nothing to do with my point about allying with libertarians to reduce the size and scope of federal government to its Constitutionally enumerated powers. Which is a good plan, but you can't bring yourself to admit it.

139 posted on 02/12/2011 4:16:21 PM PST by backwoods-engineer (Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: backwoods-engineer

nothing to do with I can’t admit that we should join with libertarians it has everything to do as others have pointed out to you that libertarians need to get their own convention that they are socially liberal
hell I’ve talked to one who said on here he had no problem with a daughter marrying her father or them ahvingt sex or a human having sex wiht animals and then getting married

sorry but if you want to join with those like minded folk then by all means but I’ll stay on the side of the conservative side


140 posted on 02/12/2011 4:20:17 PM PST by manc (Shame on all who voted for the repeal of DADT, who supported it or never tried to stop it. Traitors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson