Not so. My push is to have limited government, even when legislating what we agree is moral behavior. You and someone else may work together to get this marriage amendment passed, "for the good morals of the country," only to find that this someone else worked with the homos to force you to buy an electric car "for the good morals of the country."
My strategy is limited government, plain and simple. That includes education, which is where we are *really* losing this battle. So long as we focus on the symptom (gay marriage) and not the cause (liberal control of the education system) we are going to lose.
Well you didn’t answer the questio I asked though.
Do you believe in laws made to prevent discrimination at privately owned busineesses against people whi identify themselves by perverted sexual acitivity?
Should the government be in the business of dictating to private citizens how their business should deal with this issue?
And should a government punish citizens who do not hold the same perverted moral views that claim that people have a right to be perverts and that we all must accept thier behavior as normal?
Should soldiers be forced to either agree to deal wiith open perverts and to bunk and shower with them or be punished?
Amd most importantly why should ‘We the People’ not make an Amendment that makes our opposition to this insanity crystal clear?