The libertarian argument is an old one -the ends justifies the means. You parrot the sentiment when implying over and over again that it is critical that perverse sex be accepted IF we wish to see smaller and more constitutional government. DUH! -I am not buying such lunacy and absurdity.
You are putting words in my mouth, and it is not helping your argument. I am implying no such thing.
My thesis is: don't discount Brietbart's work that helps conservatives, even if he supports gays.
Even if Brietbart has sex with a big 'ol queer on a regular basis (HE HAS NOT SAID SO, btw), even so, if his organization is attacking big government (and it is), he is doing our cause some good. I am saying Brietbart is an ally in getting smaller, constitutional government. I am saying you can have allies (NOTE THE WORD, ALLIES) that you don't agree with 100%, but you have some common cause with.
In no way does my thesis above support gays, faggotry, fisting, Maryland, Jennings, don't-ask-don't-tell, Mitt Romney or the man in the moon. It stands alone. It has nothing to do with the "gay agenda", and stop pretending it does.
I’m becoming convinced the 100 percent club does even really care about destroying obama in 2012 anymore. To me, numero uno goals needs to be ousting this communist traitor and his admn, not infighting amongst people who otherwise agree on 80 percent or better of issues.