Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: House bill unveiled late Friday cuts EPA budget by $3 billion, blocks funding ....
Watts Up With That? ^ | February 11, 2011 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 02/12/2011 12:22:23 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

BREAKING: House bill unveiled late Friday cuts EPA budget by $3 billion, blocks funding for all current and pending EPA climate regulations for stationary CO2 source

The Hill E2 wire reports:

House GOP spending bill prohibits funding for EPA climate regs

By Andrew Restuccia - 02/11/11 07:33 PM ET

A government spending bill unveiled Friday night by House Republicans would prohibit funding for Environmental Protection Agency climate regulations through September of this year.

The continuing resolution, which would fund the government through the end of the fiscal year, is the latest attempt by Republicans to stop EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. Republicans argue that pending EPA climate rules will destroy the economy and result in significant job losses. GOP lawmakers, including House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.), have introduced legislation to permanently block the agency’s climate authority.

The bill would block funding for all current and pending EPA climate regulations for stationary sources.

Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), the chairman of the Appropriations subcommittee on interior and the environment, said he worked closely on the language with Upton. He said the language would give Upton time to move forward with his legislation.

“It has become clear to me in talking to the job creators in this country that allowing these regulations to go into effect would prevent job creation and inhibit economic growth at a time when our economy is still struggling,” Simpson said in a statement. “It should be up to Congress, not the Administration, to determine whether and how to regulate greenhouse gases, and in attempting to do so without congressional authority, I’m concerned that EPA has overreached.”

The continuing resolution makes massive cuts to the EPA’s budget. The legislation cuts EPA funding by $3 billion, 29 percent below fiscal year 2010. Overall, Simpson cut $4.5 billion from his subcommittee’s budget.

Full report here: House GOP spending bill prohibits funding for EPA climate regs


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bloggersandpersonal; carbontrade; epa; globalwarminghoax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: JPG; All
.


61 posted on 02/12/2011 2:01:02 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JPG

Amen, amen, amen! Dear God, I hope this passes!


62 posted on 02/12/2011 2:02:57 PM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76
Cutting the budget is temporary. Eliminating an agency is permanent.
63 posted on 02/12/2011 2:04:42 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Hey thanks for the link. Going right now to read.


64 posted on 02/12/2011 2:27:29 PM PST by MsLady (If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
How the hell does a regulatory agency justify that kind of expenditure?

Control ain't cheap.
65 posted on 02/12/2011 3:50:22 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Don’t get me wrong, it’s absolutely important to make big cuts in the budget. It’s just as important though to reign in if not outright eliminate agencies like the EPA, FCC, BATFE, etc. that keep passing regs with multi-trillion dollar consequences to our economy. Getting rid of some of these wouldn’t do much for the budget but the benefits would be a thousand times that.


66 posted on 02/12/2011 4:36:36 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Excellent news!
Anything that helps to kill the EPA and the crazy, far left female lunatic that runs it, can only be good for America.


67 posted on 02/13/2011 8:24:20 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Now if they can rid us of the Dept. of Ed. and interior we will see something.


68 posted on 02/13/2011 8:26:31 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
CORRECTION: Excellent news!
Anything that helps to kill weaken the EPA and the crazy, far left female lunatic that runs it, can only be good for America
69 posted on 02/13/2011 8:36:29 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
How the hell does a regulatory agency justify that kind of expenditure?

Easy.

Regulate everything. That's what EPA is reaching for.

70 posted on 02/14/2011 4:58:50 PM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson