Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian; COUNTrecount; rxsid; David; butterdezillion; Danae; Red Steel; All

I don’t understand. She’s clearly shown as Counsel of Record for Respondent for all the below referenced SCOTUS matters. She was, therefore, privy to facts from her client, BHO, was she not? And appears to have an obvious ethical conflict of interest, does she not?

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

************

No. 09-8857
Title: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Petitioner
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

Docketed: January 29, 2010

Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Case Nos.: (09-5103)
Decision Date: October 28, 2009

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~

Nov 18 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2010)

Feb 16 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.

Mar 11 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 26, 2010.

Mar 29 2010 Petition DENIED.

~~Name~~~~~~~ ~Address~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~

Attorneys for Petitioner:

Jerome Julius Brown Sr. 7209 Robin Hood Drive # 3093 (301) 357-9336
Upper Marlboro, MD 20773

Party name: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr.

Attorneys for Respondents:

Elena Kagan Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
Counsel of Record United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001

SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ.gov

Party name: Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

*********

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm


156 posted on 02/17/2011 4:40:23 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: STARWISE

She was counsel of record for Obama in a number of cases, but none of them were eligibility cases. She is recused from any case she worked on when she was the Solicitor General, but is not recused from other cases involving Obama.


158 posted on 02/17/2011 4:45:25 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

I don’t even play a lawyer on TV, but that’s what it looks like to me.


178 posted on 02/17/2011 5:18:35 PM PST by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson