Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Labyrinthos

Thus, even if Kagan and Sotomayer recuse themselves — which they won’t and shouldn’t

What makes you think they shouldn’t recuse themselves? They not only have an appearance of a conflict of interest, but a real and huge conflict of interest, their jobs.


83 posted on 02/17/2011 2:06:13 PM PST by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone
What makes you think they shouldn’t recuse themselves? They not only have an appearance of a conflict of interest, but a real and huge conflict of interest, their jobs.

Because Kagan's and Sotomayer's votes are irrelevant at this point, which is nothing more than a vote to grant or deny a petition for certiorari. Four votes are needed to grant certiorari. If Kagan and Sotomayer recuse themselves, four votes are still needed to grant certiorari. Now if the Court grants certiorari on this petition -- which it won't -- then there might be an argument for recusal. Until then, this is nothing more than WND inflaming the its base.

94 posted on 02/17/2011 2:19:12 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson