Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: FrogMom

Inelastic means that demand is constant. That means commodities like Corn, Wheat, etc.

Some goods are Elastic, meaning that demand is more variable. As people’s income increases, their demand for elastic goods usually increases. This is why, despite the 1/3rd drop in cohort population why demand for certain goods has held steady.

Demand for basic staples? Has dropped precipitously. When the demand isn’t there, these businesses have to lay off workers. Meaning that the young people don’t get hired.

You are right that increasing mechanization has an effect on the proportion of jobs, but usually, increased mechanization actually increases demand. The increase in production means that the cost to produce these goods go down, meaning that they are more affordable. Cost goes down, Demand will increase, assuming Supply remains the same. Supply wants to increase to meet demand, so more people get hired.

The decline in Elastic goods is what finally triggered the collapse in 2008. Boomers were hitting the crest of their earning years, and have been masking the overall decline in demand for the last 20 years. When their demand for elastic goods declined (it usually does in their 50s), then it exposed the underlying weaknesses in the economy.

So you have boomers getting older and spending less, which lowers demand. Since supply didn’t change, you had falling demand and an oversupply. Which means that prices will fall. At a point prices fall so sharply, that people can’t afford to stay in business, so they lay off folks or go out of business. This means the Kids who are supposed to keep the Ponzi game running are out of work, and can’t pay in.

Which gives us, along with the Marxist clown a 3 trillion dollar deficit when he tries to double government spending in a year.


84 posted on 03/05/2011 2:18:00 PM PST by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: BenKenobi

Good discussion.

The only possible fallacy I can see to your thinking is that FrogDad and I are boomers.

Always been employed, always paid taxes. Raised three kids. Once the kids left home, and had been on their own 5-10 years so we could quit slipping them money, our spending on “stuff” doubled or tripled. So, in our 50s when we are supposed to slow down, we started spending. Got most of the debt gone, bought some toys, ate out MUCH more frequently.

I have friends in similar situations. We aren’t the norm, but I’ll bet there are a lot of us out there.


94 posted on 03/05/2011 5:27:52 PM PST by FrogMom (There is no such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson