but isnt that already basically stated [w/o the timeline] in the Constitution regarding all things un-Constitutional ???
BUT we lost the balls to decorate lamposts and painfully tar & feather usurpers...
>i like it, it has ‘teeth’...
Thank you.
>but isnt that already basically stated [w/o the timeline] in the Constitution regarding all things un-Constitutional ???
No, not really.
Even Treason, the only Crime which is defined in the Constitution, does not have an attached penalty, in fact it has a *restriction* on possible punishments. {”Corruption of Blood,” which I believe is saying “because the father of the family committed treason his wife and children all must be put to death as well!”}
>BUT we lost the balls to decorate lamposts and painfully tar & feather usurpers...
Sadly true.
I cannot tell you how many times people have told me NOT to test the State Constitution which, in Art II Sec. 6, says:
[Right to bear arms.]
No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense,
for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall
be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate,
in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms.
Yet, contrary to the second sentence, on all City or County courthouses there are “No Weapons” signs posted.
*OR*
The School & University Firearm bans, which violate the first sentence:
http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=query&iid=1ce95e25.7bd11288.0.0&q=%5BGroup%20%2730-7-2.1%27%5D
and
http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=query&iid=1ce95e25.7bd11288.0.0&q=%5BGroup%20%2730-7-2.4%27%5D
respectively.
Apparently it is verboten to stand up and say “prove it!” to a branch of the government. [/semi-cynic]