It is all politics. We are the exact same way except the opposite of them. We were in full support of Iraq because we had a Republican President but since we have a Democratic President we are against it. Nothing different here.
That dog won't hunt. There is no equivalence.
We've had no congressional debate. There are no American lives or strategic interests to protect.
We've had no address to the American people explaining the underlying reasons, the goal and the players.
There was plenty of criticism of W because he had campaigned against "nation building" and Clinton's interventionist foreign policy.
"We were in full support of Iraq" when the case had been made although some of us were unsure of our ability to "win the peace" ... you know, that whole nation-building thing.
Considering Palin and other supported the no-fly zone, I don't see how you can say this is about politics. Rather, it's about the lack of decisive leadership, unclear mission and inept process throughout.
Wrong Naps.
I'm not against the USA using force in libya, but since we are in it, take off the gloves, put smart bombs where muammer is walking, talking sleeping, until he assumes room temperature.
What to do with the al-quada cells that are in libya is a bigger question.
I would say, use nukes, turn libya into glass for 1,000 years.
I disagree. This war is is insanity. We already have two wars, and I don’t trust Obama’s motives at all.