[curiosity]

No, I'm just being snarky, and in so doing making a counter-point that invalidates your point.

Let me spell it out for you, since you seem to have a very literal mind:

It's absurd to determine the validity of a proposed interpretation of the Constitution by asking whether it would produce a desireable result in some hypotheical scenario the founders could not possibly have forseen.

[Fantasywriter]

So you did miss the entire point. Okay.

I didn’t write that for you. I wrote it many mos ago. I’ve posted it all over FR. You’re the only one who read it [or did you?] who doesn’t have a clue what it’s about.

Sad.