[Dilbert San Diego]

It all depends on the political leanings of people.

The liberals still think that Bush stole the 2000 election because of the Florida recount fiasco. They are convinced that fraud and improper intervention of the Supreme Court overturned the results of an election. They are wrong, but that’s what they think.

On the other hand, the bizarre goings-on in the Al Franken recount in Minnesota had nothing to do with fraud, according to the liberals. And they were all too happy to see a ruling favorable to them come out of the Minnesota Supreme Court.

So if the Democrat wins a disputed election, the recount and legal process was all legitimate, according to the liberals. On the other hand, if the process results in the Republican winning, then by definition, it was fraudulent or illegal.

[JimRed]

...especially if, as I expect, supporters of Prosser raise ugly truthful allegations of voter fraud....

[Joe 6-pack]

LOL....Note that there is no condemnation of democrats committing voter fraud, only of republicans raising the ugly specter thereof....

[freekitty]

There is fraud on the Dem side and I am shouting it on the highest rooftop. There is always fraud with the Dems. They can’t win without it.