Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kellis91789

The existing plan also makes a phased in SS/M privatization MUCH harder.


31 posted on 04/20/2011 8:00:47 AM PDT by RockinRight (Trump's "fake" conservatism is still better than the "real" conservatism of most of the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight

Yes, it does. Putting SS/M into a “consolidated budget” was a mistake because it had its own separate funding. (The same could be argued with the fuel taxes and Department of Transportation.) Eliminating the separate funding makes SS/M even more of a mess.

The FairTax breaks the relationship between contributions to SS/M and the benefits paid out to an individual. It effectively removes the cap on SS taxes so high earners get taxed on all their spending/income, but their benefits are still cut off as though they had mediocre earnings.

Ironically, it also cheats people whose income is mainly from tips — waitresses, doormen, haircutters, etc. — because it allows a maximum of $5,000/yr of tip income to be counted for SS benefits calculations.


32 posted on 04/20/2011 8:14:44 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson