Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/23/2011 3:46:36 PM PDT by OL Hickory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: OL Hickory

Sounds good. The more they throw away money at lost causes, the less they will have to do something really constructive with it.


2 posted on 04/23/2011 3:49:49 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

Heck, if they need $10 dollars to pay Hawaii to release the BC, I will give it to them on the condition that the fraudulent bum has signed the release request and that he actually has one.


3 posted on 04/23/2011 3:53:14 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Obama and the left are making a mockery of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

Why fight this if there is nothing wrong?


4 posted on 04/23/2011 3:55:00 PM PDT by RockinRight (Maybe Trump's a stalking horse for Palin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

Sounds like an admission of GUILT!


5 posted on 04/23/2011 3:57:24 PM PDT by goodtomato (I'm really, really blessed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

Also sounds like they’re worried about it. I mean if your candidate is legit, how could this possibly be a fundraiser?
How do you even approach the subject with your donors?

Mr. & Mrs. Democrat supporter, Please help us keep a Non-Citizen in the White House?
Isn’t most dems assertion that he has a LFBC, but he’s already proved his citizenship. Why should they care if he has to do it again?
I’d have to ask the fundraiser, “Who are you guy’s planning on running, a Somali Warlord?”


6 posted on 04/23/2011 3:59:24 PM PDT by rikkir (I had to show my BC to play Little League, he should have to show his to be President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

Don’t have bills to check the credentials of prospective candidates. Don’t have voter ID laws. It seems to me that Democrats like it when it is easier to commit fraud.


7 posted on 04/23/2011 3:59:28 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; OL Hickory
Democrats used the very question of ""natural born citizen" against the 1916 Republican nominee, Charles Evans Hughes. His father was a British subject. He lost to Woodrow Wilson so it became a moot point.

Breckenridge Long, later FDR's Secretary of State, wrote a lengthy legal piece questioning whether Hughes was a "natural born citizen." It appeared in “Chicago Legal News,” Vol. 146, p. 220 in 1916. The article text can be found online.

Who doesn't think a Hughes victory would've lead to challenge by Democrats on NBC grounds?

We need eligibility bills made law to put an end to this game playing. It's not about Obama. These questions have come before. They'll come again.

8 posted on 04/23/2011 4:18:46 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

The Dems are absolutely not unhappy with the “birther” issue. They are using it to make conservatives out to be kooks. Soon you will have mid level operatives on TV saying that the “birthers” are like “truthers”, but the difference is “trutherism” was never promoted by mainstream Dem candidates, like it is with Trump. This is a lose/lose issue.


9 posted on 04/23/2011 4:24:18 PM PDT by Little Pharma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

Even if they raise a little money, there will still be the few sane democrats that will look at the letter and wonder why in the world it would be wrong to have to show your birth certificate. They’re sowing the seeds of doubt about Barry within their own ranks, obviously to stupid to realize it.


10 posted on 04/23/2011 4:28:38 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory
"...asking donors to give money to help stop bills requiring birth certificates for presidential candidates being considered in various red states,"

Based on that, one can safely assume that obama does NOT have a birth certificate.

Else, it wouldn't matter...

SIMPLE QUESTION
11 posted on 04/23/2011 4:39:32 PM PDT by FrankR (Liberals Don't Have Scruples, Judgement or Morals...only MOTIVES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

Have they raised the ten dollars yet? Heck, I’ll kick in a dollar for that.


12 posted on 04/23/2011 4:44:54 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

OF COURSE they do — because “Birthers” are portrayed as fanatics — and many ACT like it. It will play well FOR the Progressives, and it will HURT Conservatives. There are WAYS to pursue truth without going Quixotic and tilting at windmills.


22 posted on 04/23/2011 7:13:59 PM PDT by patriot preacher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory

It’d seem Dems would be MAD about this issue. Instead of spending $2 million plus... just SHOW THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

Taking a political position that we don’t follow the basic laws of this country is a political loser.

Obama will be in the 30s soon in polls. This is an easy issue for average Americans to understand: Your gas prices are high and you have no job and your future is looking bad because we’ve got a Usurper selling out our country.

It’s a winner for Republicans and an easy knock out punch. Obama obviously can’t show the BC because... he either can’t (doesn’t exist), can’t because he’d be disqualified (location of birth), or he can’t politically (he changed his name later in life to Barack Hussein Obama).

Republicans absolutely should pursue this issue. It’s a winner.


27 posted on 04/23/2011 11:31:37 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OL Hickory
Democrats may be upset with all the questions about President Barack Obama’s birthplace, but some are starting to use the issue to their advantage.

Trying to raise money in order to prevent yourself from being exposed as a complete and total fraud is NOT typically referred to as gaining any sort of advantage. It's more commonly referred to as being on the defensive, and in this case probably scared sh!tless of what might happen if the US Constitution is actually enforced.

34 posted on 04/24/2011 11:32:57 AM PDT by Golden Eagle (Buy American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson