Sounds good. The more they throw away money at lost causes, the less they will have to do something really constructive with it.
Heck, if they need $10 dollars to pay Hawaii to release the BC, I will give it to them on the condition that the fraudulent bum has signed the release request and that he actually has one.
Why fight this if there is nothing wrong?
Sounds like an admission of GUILT!
Also sounds like they’re worried about it. I mean if your candidate is legit, how could this possibly be a fundraiser?
How do you even approach the subject with your donors?
Mr. & Mrs. Democrat supporter, Please help us keep a Non-Citizen in the White House?
Isn’t most dems assertion that he has a LFBC, but he’s already proved his citizenship. Why should they care if he has to do it again?
I’d have to ask the fundraiser, “Who are you guy’s planning on running, a Somali Warlord?”
Don’t have bills to check the credentials of prospective candidates. Don’t have voter ID laws. It seems to me that Democrats like it when it is easier to commit fraud.
Breckenridge Long, later FDR's Secretary of State, wrote a lengthy legal piece questioning whether Hughes was a "natural born citizen." It appeared in Chicago Legal News, Vol. 146, p. 220 in 1916. The article text can be found online.
Who doesn't think a Hughes victory would've lead to challenge by Democrats on NBC grounds?
We need eligibility bills made law to put an end to this game playing. It's not about Obama. These questions have come before. They'll come again.
The Dems are absolutely not unhappy with the “birther” issue. They are using it to make conservatives out to be kooks. Soon you will have mid level operatives on TV saying that the “birthers” are like “truthers”, but the difference is “trutherism” was never promoted by mainstream Dem candidates, like it is with Trump. This is a lose/lose issue.
Even if they raise a little money, there will still be the few sane democrats that will look at the letter and wonder why in the world it would be wrong to have to show your birth certificate. They’re sowing the seeds of doubt about Barry within their own ranks, obviously to stupid to realize it.
Have they raised the ten dollars yet? Heck, I’ll kick in a dollar for that.
OF COURSE they do — because “Birthers” are portrayed as fanatics — and many ACT like it. It will play well FOR the Progressives, and it will HURT Conservatives. There are WAYS to pursue truth without going Quixotic and tilting at windmills.
It’d seem Dems would be MAD about this issue. Instead of spending $2 million plus... just SHOW THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
Taking a political position that we don’t follow the basic laws of this country is a political loser.
Obama will be in the 30s soon in polls. This is an easy issue for average Americans to understand: Your gas prices are high and you have no job and your future is looking bad because we’ve got a Usurper selling out our country.
It’s a winner for Republicans and an easy knock out punch. Obama obviously can’t show the BC because... he either can’t (doesn’t exist), can’t because he’d be disqualified (location of birth), or he can’t politically (he changed his name later in life to Barack Hussein Obama).
Republicans absolutely should pursue this issue. It’s a winner.
Trying to raise money in order to prevent yourself from being exposed as a complete and total fraud is NOT typically referred to as gaining any sort of advantage. It's more commonly referred to as being on the defensive, and in this case probably scared sh!tless of what might happen if the US Constitution is actually enforced.