Skip to comments.
Vanity: Is a name change possible?
Posted on 04/26/2011 3:52:07 PM PDT by WillRain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: spyone
I misspelled your old user name in post # 13 . Sorry .
To: WillRain
You'll need the portable Cone Of Silence to share your new handle and password with the mods.
42
posted on
04/26/2011 5:18:46 PM PDT
by
MarineBrat
(Better dead than red!)
To: JustaDumbBlonde
43
posted on
04/26/2011 5:19:49 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
To: OwenKellogg
Blast from the past. Been a long time since I’ve seen an Ash Alert.
To: Focault's Pendulum
Shyster!
You know he/she/it must first send a money order in the sum of $10,000.00 to me, before he/she/it is eventually directed to you for the final payoff.
I hate it when you try to shortcut the system!
During the next official Viking Kitty finance meeting, your name WILL come under intensive investigation.
I doubt you will enjoy what happens next...
45
posted on
04/26/2011 5:37:14 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
To: WillRain
Change it from Soetoro to Dunham to Obama.
46
posted on
04/26/2011 5:41:56 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
To: WillRain
Ask to change it to “classygreeneyedbrunette.”
47
posted on
04/26/2011 5:42:14 PM PDT
by
scott7278
("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked..." - BHO)
To: sarasmom
During the next official Viking Kitty finance meeting, your name WILL come under intensive investigation. I doubt you will enjoy what happens next... The same thing you did to Bob????
To: ClearCase_guy
***Ash Alert!***
Oh, noes. Not Ash again. It’s been years, hasn’t it?
49
posted on
04/26/2011 6:13:12 PM PDT
by
kitkat
( I sure HOPE that it's time for a CHANGE from Obama.)
To: Invincibly Ignorant
Did you retain your ‘gravitas?’ If I had known, over 11 years ago, that I would still be ‘here’ I would have been waaay more creative and original with my handle.
50
posted on
04/26/2011 6:14:39 PM PDT
by
PennsylvaniaMom
(Newt Gingrich, he would rather sit on a couch with Nancy Pelosi, than stand with Sarah Palin.)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
51
posted on
04/26/2011 7:36:05 PM PDT
by
it_ürür
(kervan yürür)
To: PennsylvaniaMom
Did you retain your ‘gravitas?’ If I had known, over 11 years ago, that I would still be ‘here’ I would have been waaay more creative and original with my handle.Ya kept it. That was probably 10 years ago and don't think they allow it anymore. Don't know that for sure but I haven't seen anyone else do it.
To: Persevero
that's what I did - and some over-zealous admin revoked the posting privileges within the hour and deleted all posts.
if that account were to be unlocked, I'd be happy to accept that compromise.
53
posted on
04/26/2011 11:24:44 PM PDT
by
WillRain
("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
To: Invincibly Ignorant
I don’t know who they are - it’s probably listed in some nice obvious place I’ve yet to find. (I know who Jim is but I assume it’s bad form to go straight to the boss)
54
posted on
04/26/2011 11:25:59 PM PDT
by
WillRain
("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
To: OwenKellogg
Ash? Meh. If yall are that bound up in paranoia then It's probably best I stayed away. I really don't know what the "Ash Saga" involves but I invite anyone who's suspicious to review my posting history under this name and see if it lines up with your suspicions or no. I have nothing to hide in that record.
There is a real, and rather glaring reason why i seek this change, which should it be approved you will instantly understand and should, I assume, allay your assumptions. But if not, oh well.
55
posted on
04/26/2011 11:29:31 PM PDT
by
WillRain
("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
To: humblegunner
Must have been looser standards back in the day I guess. You’d think I’d not have reached 1,300+ posts if that was a major sticking point.
56
posted on
04/26/2011 11:31:16 PM PDT
by
WillRain
("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
To: don-o
I'l answer this privately for now, as i do not wish to sidetrack the thread. if my request is granted (either of them) then it will be obvious
(and I'll probably be banned then anyway)
57
posted on
04/26/2011 11:33:05 PM PDT
by
WillRain
("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
To: buccaneer81
oh they’re figured out all right.
58
posted on
04/26/2011 11:37:42 PM PDT
by
WillRain
("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
To: scott7278
59
posted on
04/26/2011 11:39:36 PM PDT
by
WillRain
("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
To: chuckles
Where is it implied I don't believe what I post? Why does a name change which leaves the post history intact imply some breach of faith with those comments?
Ultimately it's NOT a big deal. Probably best I just move on anyway, but I'm a tiny bit contrarian on the point.
60
posted on
04/26/2011 11:42:32 PM PDT
by
WillRain
("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson