[philman_36]

Simply amazing. Still no response. I even ran my necessary errands for the day to give you time to respond.
I can readily state how I came to my conclusions and you can't? I figured you would've had something at the ready yourself.

So what do you consider is valid US law concerning NBC? Or is it your belief that there is no law, not even the Constitution, concerning NBC?

[Jim Noble]

Big of you, running your errands to give me time.

I’m quite sure I have more errands that you.

You keep misconstruing my posts. OBVIOUSLY the Art II reQuirements are binding law. Ascertaining age and residency is trivial.

With no Art II definition, no US Code, and no binding o precedent, there is no VALID method to exclude a candidate for lacking NBC status, other than birth elsewhere and naturalized status.

It’s my opinion that a ruling that Vattel’s definition applied in this case will never be made, and if it were written into the US Code (a very good idea), it would not operate retroactively.