Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void
Why was the last digit scanned with a lower resolution and contrast than the bulk of the document?

This document wasn't scanned. There are no optical scanning artifacts. The idiot who compiled the document made the mistake of dragging a "1" from another document with a different resolution and resized it to match the height of these numbers but did it with the size on the screen small enough that he wasn't able to see the mismatch.
96 posted on 04/29/2011 2:30:33 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan

Bingo.


98 posted on 04/29/2011 2:39:39 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 827 of our national holiday from reality. - What 3 AM phone call?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: aruanan
This document wasn't scanned. There are no optical scanning artifacts. The idiot who compiled the document made the mistake of dragging a "1" from another document with a different resolution and resized it to match the height of these numbers but did it with the size on the screen small enough that he wasn't able to see the mismatch.

Well, if that were true than any image of the document floating around out there would have different resolutions. If the master forgery were done that poorly, than all copies would be that poor if not worse. But that is not what we see in the document scanned for the AP and released by the AP.

Photobucket

99 posted on 04/29/2011 2:40:41 PM PDT by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson