I believe that you are correct. I saw an earlier article in which she stated that the legislation was so poorly written that it could put law-abiding concealed carriers at legal risk. I did not read the details of the bill, but if that’s true, then she had her citizens’ best interests at heart.
I had the same reaction of most commenters here when I read only the headline. I imagine that’s what the MSM would like to have happen...
If this were the only pro-rights bill she vetoed this year, I'd be willing to accept that explanation without question. But she's vetoed every single one, with the exception of the stupid and symbolic adoption of a state firearm, after signing all of them last year. She's also vetoed other bills the intent of which was good (although I haven't taken the time to investigate the details). She's acting exactly like someone being blackmailed by liberals.