Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe; Carlucci

But, people can’t refuse to go back years in one case and call it legitimate in another.

That applies to both pubbies and dems.

You can’t say Bush gets blame for the economy and then say he gets no credit for Osama.

Likewise, we can’t say he gets no blame for the economy and then say he gets credit for Osama.

We/They can’t have it both ways.


9 posted on 05/02/2011 9:08:18 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Well, when it comes to the economy, NOBODY is saying that Bush had no part in it. It began to crumble while he was still in office. Everybody knew it then and knows it now.

THIS -The War on Terror, was vilified by the left all along. We were PICKING on poor old Bin Laden.. it was illegal.. it was only for oil, etc..

Apples and Oranges.


12 posted on 05/02/2011 9:14:51 AM PDT by J40000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

There’s always the actual facts/truth of what happened in each case (economy and WOT/bin Laden).

Nobody’s going to trap me into the blame/credit game that the media and the pundits and the politicians play, wherein the template is set by them and we can’t use facts/truth to seperate the wheat from the chaff.


16 posted on 05/02/2011 9:19:59 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...HOLD TO THE TRUTH; SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson