Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: campaignPete R-CT
All other things being equal, I would be favorably disposed to support a candidate who announced he (or she) was skipping the dog and pony shows in Iowa and New Hampshire and going straight to South Carolina to begin the campaign.

Both Iowa and New Hampshire have a vastly overinflated sense of importance.

Both are pissant states.

Both allow independents and RINOs to skew their results. And there will be more of them this year with no Democrat contest.

Both are full of social conservatives who love economic populism like ethanol subsidies (in the case of Iowa) or economic conservatives who love giving the finger to social conservatives (in the case of New Hampshire).

12 posted on 05/04/2011 2:03:29 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

Ask Rudy Giuliani how that strategy worked. Granted he put his eggs in Florida rather than South Carolina, but there are similarities. I think that South Carolina and Florida are the two most important primary states, but a candidate almost has to have a top 2 finish in Iowa and/or New Hampshire to win one of those states.


15 posted on 05/04/2011 8:32:55 PM PDT by conservativebuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson