“But if she can’t get her negatives down beyond her somewhat shrinking Republican base it’s a big sweat for nothing. Newt in a debate will shrink the field in knowledge, reason, political experience and Independents will be all ears. You know, the ones who will elect the next prez.”
Wait, if she loses the base, but gets independents (outside that base as you said), then it’s a big sweat for nothing. But, Newt, who WILL NEVER CARRY THE BASE (really, get real), but may can sweet talk independents, has a chance. That logic makes not sense. You contradicted yourself. Unless you misspoke..... or unless you think Newt can carry the base and in that case....BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH
“Unless you misspoke..... or unless you think Newt can carry the base and in that case....BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH “ ======
Let me break this down for you thusly:
I said, “But if she can’t get her negatives down beyond her somewhat shrinking Republican base it’s a big sweat for nothing.
“..BEYOND HER SHRINKING REPUBLICAN BASE..” means her negatives BEYOND her shrinking Republican base! You know, beyond WHERE SHE HAS NO NEGATIVES AT ALL, but rather and instead an assured coronation. BEYOND means BEYOND the “gimme” territory, you know, where her negatives actually lay.
On Newt: The base of the Republican Party will be electing NO ONE, no matter who we are for. If our nominee can in the General Election can garner the Independents they are in like Flint to the White House.
If Sarah can get Independents she wins. (If she can get Republicans to nominate her over Newt, or others.) There will be cross over voting in primaries this time to nominate a moderate, to my great frustration. bwahahahaha, not.