Posted on 05/07/2011 7:01:47 AM PDT by opentalk
Steyn has a woeful lack of knowledge on natural born citizenship and Obama loving this? Only if the courts, the media, and the rest of his enablers quit covering for him, and let his past leak out into the public, then Obama would be hating it.
I hate to be precise, but swearing on the Constitution doesn't sound quite right.
Perhaps swearing about the Constitution would be correct. Perhaps swearing an oath to support, uphold and defend the Constitution is correct. But swearing on the Constitution just doesn't sound like what I think you were saying.
If obama is encouraged by anything his opponents have done, it is not just their conceding the Constitutional eligibility issue to him. It was when his opposition then took up his cause and began to attack those of us who are not willing to let his ineligibility go.
I do not believe he anticipated this or he would have released the BC he recently provided before the 2008 election.
We make it easy for him to have his way with us and our precious Constitution. He takes our territory and we fall back. He takes our rights and liberty and we fall back. Whatever he does, no matter how outrageous, we fall back.
We are simply the best political opposition and enemies he could ever have hoped for. Not even Clinton was that lucky.
I think you are barking up the wrong tree.
I would be first in line to show Obamas communist roots if I could make it stick. Hell, he isnt even a communist He just uses that socialism ploy to punk people. Community activist and all that.
He divides and conquers.
The simple truth is, that the BC matter has NO TRACTION
He is very happy to keep us focused on it.
You do know that The Clinton matter. was not about the stain on the dress.
It was about perjury.
All I am saying is keep your eye on the ball
I used FoxLingo to search OneLook, which in turn searches 930 English online dictionaries (the last of the two links I posted). That was convincing enough for me (showed up on wiki and urban dictionary as a slang term...
About Clinton's impeachment, for one of the few times he got something right, Lindsey Graham said it wasn't about what you know, it's about what you can prove.
It's more correct to say "what you are willing to prove" and for the feckless republicans, that would be nothing.
It's all about being lucky enough to have republicans opposing you. No way you can lose with opponents like that...especially if you're a Bill Clinton or obama.
It doesn't matter what they do, there's no way a republican can/would pin it on them. The obama NBC issue is an excellent example, but only one of many. I hope and pray that I will someday be wrong about that.
Maybe Issa's got something? Would it matter? I'm sure we can talk him out of it.
We'll just replay the same old excuses again, just like y'all did with the NBC issue.
There will always be something more important to focus on, some bigger ball to keep our eyes upon and more of our territory, rights, freedom, liberty and wealth to give up for the promise of demonrat provided security. That's the plan, right?
Van Buren's, Buchanan's, Wilson's, and Hoover's parents were all Americans at the time of their birth. Please stop posting lies to FreeRepublic.com.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.