I don’t get it. Why is 3-5% of the population (even smaller for the “activist” segment only) allowed to intimidate anyone into resigning? He should have just said, “so what?” and stayed. Who got to him and what did they use?
I suspect its closer to 1% for the general population -- but it is in the significant double-digits (20%? 30%? more?) amongst the newsrooms, newspapers, and screenwriters.
Thus, their ability to amplify their advocacy for perversions.
And all he did was to exercise his constitutional right to support a valid political activity. I think the “gays” are going way beyound the pale in their vendetta against anyone who disagrees with them. With them it is all scorched earth policy all the time.