Obama’s FR apologists claim that demanding the president prove his constitutional qualifications is a waste of time; at the same time, they always have the time to chime in with their ad ignorantium opinions.
It doesn't take much time to point out that argumentum ad ignorantium is a logical fallacy--that just because you don't have proof doesn't mean something is proven false.
Sorta like BHO's birth claims.
Obama’s FR apologists claim that demanding the president prove his constitutional qualifications is a waste of time; at the same time, they always have the time to chime in with their ad ignorantium opinions.
Plus it takes valuable time away from the area of their real investigative focus...is Trig really Sarah’s baby.
True! To them our Constitution is also a waste of time. Didn’t The Won say, it’s a living document? ......ugh!