The only person who could factually make that statement would be a forensic document examiner.
You are correct, but if someone like Bret Baier or Chris Wallace or John Gibson were to say that they’ve examined it and it looks legit, it would at least lend a tinge of credibility. At this point there’s nothing at all but smoke and mirrors and lies and fraud.
And that’s who we need to eventually look at whatever Hawaii has for Obama - as well as the computer logs to show the processing done on that record.
We REALLY need a state law that allows presidential eligibility to be challenged by normal people. All the evidence needs to be subpoenaed and tested forensically at this point.