Replies

I could care less if he was born in the middle of Times Square.

The issue is as follows:

Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was born a British subject of the Crown when Kenya belonged to Great Britain. To be a natural born citizen and meet constitutional requirements BOTH parents must be US citizens.

The usurper is NOT a natural born citizen.

Understood - Obama, by his own admission, is the first person to serve as US President since William Henry Harrison (with the possible exception of Chester Alan Arthur) to be a British subject at birth.

But unfortunately if the matter were so clear it should have been brought up before the election. Looking back, it's astonishing that more was not said, at least by people like Mark Levin.

I have strong doubts, to say the least, about Obama’s biography - his place of birth and/or the identity of his father, especially.

And the media outlets have been slavish in their bias - even Kim Jong-Il must be envious of such a compliant press!

But we have a document presented by the White House as a state record, and the state is not making any statements that it is a fraud.

And it's possible that whatever happened in 1961 was covered up or changed at the time, so that the birth records would indeed be in order.

I respect people who want to investigate further - again, if this were Bush and a parking ticket from when he was 17 the media would have been all over this.

Absent some dramatic development I do not believe this issue will result in any further disclosures. I would love to be wrong.

I am not focusing my energies in this area, but I appreciate the people who do. I am working to educate people about the policies at stake in the next election. I believe in each case, people are doing the right thing to get America back on track. I hate top see such vicious fighting going on here, because others can read it.

Just my opinion, which no one asked for. Thanks for any responses or flames in advance. :)