Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/24/2011 1:11:03 PM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Starman417

If you voted for obama in 2008 to prove that you’re not a racist you must vote for someone else in 2012 to prove that you’re not a moron.


2 posted on 05/24/2011 1:17:55 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Good article.

Calls the MSM what they are in deed

The Propaganda Arm of The DNC!


3 posted on 05/24/2011 1:23:21 PM PDT by Snuph ("give me Liberty...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

“squashing any negative stories” ??? they admit that?
can you imagine the howls if Bush had done this in 2003 ?

...this is a little too close to the “Ministry of Truth” for my taste...


4 posted on 05/24/2011 1:27:51 PM PDT by Elendur (the hope and change i need: Sarah / Colonel West in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Ministry of Truth.

True free speech and free press only comes with proper government oversight and regulation.

But we can see how you ignorant little people would be confused.

Now pay your taxes, we need raises.


5 posted on 05/24/2011 1:36:13 PM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Interesting quote from across the pond (UK). “My colleague Damian Thompson appears to be under the impression that Obama is a great guy because he said nice things about the Queen. Look, I think the Queen’s great too, but did it really not occur to my distinguished colleague (and editor) that there might have been a hint of an ulterior motive here? Obama can’t stand Britain (his wife likes us even less): he made that clear enough when he sent back Winston Churchill’s bust and dissed our Prime Minister with those dodgy DVDS. He blames us for what happened to his grandfather during Mau Mau. He doesn’t believe in the Special Relationship. Are we honestly supposed to believe in that during the subsequent year in office, Obama has since acquired such wisdom and insight that he suddenly realises how special we are?

Of course he hasn’t. Obama is just doing now what all bullies and losers start doing when they realise how unpopular they are and that everyone is abandoning them. They suck up to anybody and everybody. They whore themselves piteously before enemies they once considered beneath their contempt. Fain will they fill their bellies with husks that swine eat – but which no man will give them: and serve them jolly well right, too!

By all means let us enjoy watching Obama smarm and grovel and ingratiate himself like some presidential Uriah Heep. But for heaven’s sake let us never give him the benefit of the doubt. He’s a cold fish and would certainly never show any mercy towards us were the roles to be reversed.”


6 posted on 05/24/2011 1:39:19 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

“It is time for our congressmen to challenge this latest challenge to the Constitution and not let this tragedy continue.”

LOL...the only thing congressmen care about is “show me the money”.


8 posted on 05/24/2011 2:15:07 PM PDT by radioone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417
[In the] world of state controlled [academia and] media [SCAM] . . . Obama has appointed a Director of 'Progressive' Media & Online Response, within the communications department. We are now paying to end our freedom of speech. . . .

The First Amendment is being czar and fettered.

9 posted on 05/24/2011 2:17:57 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starman417

Since 1951, the U.S. Congress has placed restrictions in its annual appropriation bills which state “No part of any appropriation contained in this or any other Act shall be used for publicity or propaganda purposes within the United States not heretofore authorized by the Congress.”

The Congressional Research Service issued a clarification in 2005 which explained “publicity or propaganda is defined by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to mean either (1) self-aggrandizement by public officials, (2) purely partisan activity, or (3) covert propaganda.”


10 posted on 05/24/2011 2:44:49 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson