Skip to comments.L.A. Times Attacks Palin Because She Isn't a Thief, Liar, Pervert or Criminal
Posted on 06/20/2011 8:09:50 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
Anyone not convinced of the abject terror Sarah Palin instills in members of the American media needs only read the brief, L.A. Times reflection on the former Governors released emails.
A number of media outlets filed Freedom of Information Requests demanding the release of Governor Palins emails upon her acceptance of John McCains VP offer in 2008.
The fact that these self-proclaimed guardians of liberty have yet to exhibit the slightest interest in the murky, personal and political histories of the President or the workings of the Obama White House well, no doubt there is a very good reason.
Imagine the giddy, Christmas morning type expectations of drooling journalists when 24,000 pages of Sarahs most intimate, previously private correspondence were dumped on a desk in Juneau by Alaska State officials last Friday.
So certain were these Sherlocks of the airwaves that they finally held the key to Palins ultimate destruction, a number of media moguls even advertised for help from viewers/readers to wade through the mass of paper.
But in the end, liberal heads exploded in frustration as Sarah Palin was discovered to be an honest, hard working Governor. No schemes, no criminal enterprises, no racist tendencies, no theft nor lies, no perverse photo attachments or clandestine trysts.
So what is a tragically despondent media to do? Attack, disparage and mock, of course!
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
If Palin was a declared Lesbian, or Communist, or anti-America, the Left would love her. The Left loves all things evil. They worship it.
I’m waiting for the ‘oh so fair’ Washington Post and New York Times to do the same to some random dem governor...
For virtually all lib women there is only one issue: abortion. Or more to the point being pro-abortion. If Palin had declared herself pro-choice and aborted her latest child, suddenly many libs would find her to be “nuanced” and “moderate” and “gee, I’ll have to rethink my position on Palin.” I say this because I’ve talked to a number of lib women, including friends, family members, and co-workers, and when asked about what issues they thought were important, abortion “rights” was usually the first thing they mentioned.
Shes not even a candidate.
It’s telling that they have no issues with the declared candidates.
The main reason the hard Left supports abortion is that it negates the importance of human life. That makes the collective and their plans easier to implement. The reason others support “the right to choose murder” is that they don’t want to take personal responsibility for their actions. A baby would be too inconvenient or too expensive at that particular time in their lives.
They don’t want personal responsibility. They would all rather just live with mom and dad as long as mom and dad didn’t have rules.