Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/20/2011 9:11:23 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: drypowder
What a crock. I have carried for more than 20 years in the civilian world and at times I have a drink or two. When I do I do not drive or carry a firearm. He indicates a belief that people who carry have no common since or self discipline. What a moron and a LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!
Before my civilian permit I carried a fully automatic weapon for Uncle Sam for 20+ years. There were more than a few drunken parties attended by most of our units personnel and no one ever shot anyone they weren't supposed to..
So you can see that reality shows very clearly that this moron is nothing more that a statistic manipulating liar. I know dozens of people who carry by permit and not one of them have ever been under the influence of alcohol when they have drawn a firearm. This kind of BS needs to be exposed and the authors displayed for the liars that they are.
65 posted on 06/20/2011 10:41:33 AM PDT by oldenuff2no (Rangers lead the way...... Delta, the original European home land security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder

Davis, Ca is Berkely, Ca writ small......

When Tom MacClintock held his town hall meeting prior to Obamacare, the meeting was attended by about 200 people sporting “Progressive Democrats of America” tee shirts. They had piled out of cars sporting Davis School District parking passes. ( Davis is NOT in Tom’s congressional district nor anywhere close to it)

When questioned about their organization I commented to a couple of “ladies” that any organization having “progressive” in it’s title was sure to be communist in it’s orientation. I was promtly assualted with fists/elbows.

People in Davis are rabidly extreme leftists......all of them!

Not surprized that they are against anyone excersizing their constitutional rights, and that they try to demoguoge
any that do.


70 posted on 06/20/2011 11:08:07 AM PDT by Forty-Niner (Palin/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder

Rooster Cogburn would give that princess a heart attack!


72 posted on 06/20/2011 11:24:41 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder

Bull cookies.


73 posted on 06/20/2011 11:27:52 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder

Wonder what that means about this gun-totting Texan who’s never drunk a drop of alcohol in his lifetime?


74 posted on 06/20/2011 11:59:07 AM PDT by LoneStarGI (Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder

This must be true. I engaged in the risky behavior of transporting my guns, and a case of beer, across a lake one day. Before reaching the other side, the boat somehow capsized, spilling it’s contents.

Well, I did manage to save the remaining beer. Sadly, all the guns were lost.


78 posted on 06/20/2011 12:18:57 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder

“Gun owners who carry concealed weapons or have confronted another person with a gun are more than twice as likely to drink heavily as people who do not own guns”

Odd bedmates don’t you think:a category including CCW and drunks who confront others with a gun.

It’s obvious that those who’ve confronted others with a gun are more likely to be heavy drinkers. Drunks do all kinds of dangerous things.

But why include CCW in that category? For one reason only: to tar their reputation with the statistical behavior of drunk gun-toters.

They’ve mixed a few apples with a bunch of eggs and then “proved” statistically how easily apples shatter when dropped.

I could do a study with nuns and male homosexuals in the same group and “prove” how nuns are much more likely to contract AIDS than the general population.


79 posted on 06/20/2011 12:22:32 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder

This is total BS. Nothing but commie propaganda. Liberals are the largest known drinkers. Shooters I know rarely even drink.


81 posted on 06/20/2011 1:12:45 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder

Oh, it’s from UC Davis: babysitter of homosexual, commie/libertarian, neo-Nazi brats from that neighborhood full of aging politicians and other big shots near there.


82 posted on 06/20/2011 1:15:47 PM PDT by familyop (Rome was burned in a day--twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drypowder
"...multi-state study shows certain gun owners more likely to drink excessively..."

"Certain" ones?

"Gun owners who carry concealed weapons or have confronted another person with a gun..."

People who are academics or sodomite convicts are linked to heavy drug abuse.


83 posted on 06/20/2011 1:38:49 PM PDT by familyop (Rome was burned in a day--twice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson