Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The one thing a President should never EVER do is piss off the Supreme Court.

Are these Democratic Party moles pulling this shit, or what?

1 posted on 07/01/2011 4:01:37 PM PDT by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SatinDoll; onyx; penelopesire; maggief; hoosiermama; SE Mom; Fred Nerks; Red Steel; seekthetruth; ..

HolyMoly .. the reach and treachery of the cretins is beyond outrageous!

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/justia-com-caught-red-handed-hiding-references-to-minor-v-happersett-in-published-us-supreme-court-opinions/


2 posted on 07/01/2011 4:10:09 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
Trust me you have only touched the tip of the iceberg. There are evil things going on. Combine this with the illegal tampering with Obama’s passport record as well as Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport records. There are other things that I choose not to mention in a public forum but they are blatant and they are extremely bad.
3 posted on 07/01/2011 4:16:53 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Whoa. If true, and I doubt whether Donofrio would lie about this, then it could be the smoking gun.

Obama managed to put the issue to sleep again by using Trump as an excuse to release his long-form COLB on the net and then immediately distract attention from the comments of experts who found it to be a forgery by breaking the news about the COLB immediately before the planned raid on bin Ladin.

I have said that I doubt very much whether this will permanently kill the problem. Obama has tried various means to kill it earlier, with eager cooperation from virtually the entire press, including conservative outlets that are presumably feeling the pressure. Yet doubts have continually persisted, and the story has revived, and I believe a majority of Americans still doubt whether he is really an American.

This story, of course, bears more immediately on the problem that if Obama’s story is accepted, then his father was still a citizen of the British colony of Kenya at the time he was born. So he is not a natural born citizen even if we take him at his word. Which is a big IF indeed, since he is a congenital liar, and both COLBs are obvious fakes.


4 posted on 07/01/2011 4:17:37 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Ping

So Leo was lucky enough to catch this. It makes you wonder how many more things are being edited to benefit the DNC and or others.

Mark my words, I don’t want it but I see CWII becoming more and more inevitable. God have mercy on us all.


5 posted on 07/01/2011 4:19:58 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Here is a lesson... instead of taking the ramblings of lunatics on blogs at face value... see if they are lying to you.

Go to the Justia page, and look at the Boyd case for yourself.

http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html

WAIT... what do we see?

Oh yes... As remarked by Mr. Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 88 U. S. 167:

And what about the Pope case that Leo is rambling about?

http://supreme.justia.com/us/193/621/case.html

YEP, Minor is clearly referenced throughout the case.

Now Leo was hoping that you wouldn’t do what I did, and click on the Justia link and see if he was lying. He wants you to take his word for everything. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if he deliberately doctored his screenshot himself to make it look like a CONSPIWACY!!!! exists where it doesn’t.

Next time, check for yourself.

Oh wait... let me guess, the Lizard people were scared because Leo boy called them out, and then they quickly went back and fixed the links in the Justia stuff, because we all know that JUSTIA IS THE BE ALLZ AND END ALLZ OF SUPREME COURTZ MATERIALZ!!!!

Right?


6 posted on 07/01/2011 4:20:25 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

4later


8 posted on 07/01/2011 4:27:39 PM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
Somebody, back in 2008, just prior to the election, ordered these revisions and saw to their execution. This is direct tampering with United States law. And it is evidence that Minor v. Happersett was known to be a huge stumbling block to POTUS eligibility.

The conspiracy to get an ineligible candidate elected president is unraveling.

11 posted on 07/01/2011 4:32:04 PM PDT by TigersEye (Wranglers not Levis. Levi Strauss is anti-2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
"There needs to be an investigation."

It will never happen in the Senate. I will have to happen in the House.

21 posted on 07/01/2011 4:55:09 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT; BP2; rxsid; null and void; Candor7; melancholy

ping


23 posted on 07/01/2011 5:06:24 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Grand Jury or Attorney General in the county where it was published, to investigate?

What should it be?


30 posted on 07/01/2011 5:35:25 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
Okay, I looked into this, and it turns out Leo is just being a loony conspiracy theorist again without checking his facts first.

This is the Justia entry for Brown v. Board of Education as it appears today.

Notice under footnote 5, it has a link to "Slaughter-House Cases."

This is Google's web cache of the same page from a few days ago.

As you can see, the name and link to the case are missing.

This appears to be a site-wide problem that they fixed and had nothing to do with covering up for Obama.

39 posted on 07/01/2011 6:07:03 PM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

aiding and abetting DNC fraud in the fund-raising for Election ‘08.

The plaintiffs will be starting to organize shortly.


40 posted on 07/01/2011 6:10:33 PM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Not sure why freedomwarrior998 is so passionate in his adamant rush to refute the info, to the extent of insulting members. If there’s no fruit to be borne, time will tell. I’m ordinarily no conspiracy buff, but I’m also tired of being expected to turn a blind eye to loose ends that don’t make sense, and this White House is one huge tangle of loose ends.


46 posted on 07/01/2011 6:23:13 PM PDT by drierice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Thank you for posting this article

I sent this to my Congressman & Senator


54 posted on 07/01/2011 6:53:21 PM PDT by ebysan (ebysan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

The 800 pound gorilla, or the pink elephant, if you prefer, in the room is of course the obvious reason for ineligibility that we all know....

A natural born US citizen is born on US soil and has 2 American citizen parents.

Barry Barack Obama Soetoro “wrote” (well, Ayers did) a whole book around his Kenyan father.

Whatever fake certificates he can fabricate, his own words condemn him as ineligible. “Dreams from my father”, a Kenyan.

Why is it that no one in the media or politics or anywhere, just says this simple truth? He’s not eligible because his father was not an American. It’s so simple.

But no, Obozo leads the nation around by the nose, taunting us with one fake BC after another, joking about having to plaster it to his forehead....etc.

When it actually doesn’t matter if he were born on the Moon. Daddy was not an American, and Barry is a usurper.

He just happens to have enough melanin to get away with all of this. It’s the soft racism of low expectations, and he used it all the way to The White House, and will punish America for the full 4 years of his miserable term.


55 posted on 07/01/2011 6:53:29 PM PDT by TheConservativeParty (PALIN 45 The cure for "meet the new boss, same as the old boss.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

If you go to the Wayback Machine via web.archive.org you can look at Justia’s archived citations of the case from before 2008. Here’s the URL for Oct. 31, 2006:

http://web.archive.org/web/20061031102938/http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html

On that date and through Feb. 19, 2008, the citation reads, “As remarked by Mr. Chief Justice WAITE in Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 167:”

As of May 19, 2008 and at least through June 25, 2009, the citation reads, “As remarked by Mr. Chief Justice Waite in @ 88 U. S. 167:”
The URL to that archived record is:

http://web.archive.org/web/20080518172703/http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/135/case.html

There can’t be much question that early in 2008 someone tampered with Justia’s record of the court decision. Now Justia’s record has been changed once again (sometime after June 25, 2009), back to the original, correct case name and reference number.

The game’s afoot, Watson.


59 posted on 07/01/2011 7:07:02 PM PDT by NECAWA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
This makes me wonder again if e-books are such a great idea.

Just think of what entities like google could accidentally leave out of an edition...

115 posted on 07/02/2011 6:53:15 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
The one thing a President should never EVER do is piss off the Supreme Court.
Are these Democratic Party moles pulling this shit, or what?

We need some serious input from attorneys with extensive experience before the Supreme Court, as well as long-standing legal firms (100 years or more) to determine the extent to which this "US Supreme Court Center at Justia.com" is connected to official government sources. Is this an official part of the Judiciary Department? Is there any vetting required as there is for our intelligence agencies?
If the deletions were deliberate at which level must the perpetrator(s) have existed to pull it off?
Are these official U.S. Records?

Have the employment records between 2007 and 2011 also been compromised?
Who is best positioned and has the authority to investigate this "anomaly?"

I hope this thread reaches enough eyes to prevent its immedediate disappearance.

Shades of Sandy Burglar!!!

171 posted on 07/07/2011 6:38:38 PM PDT by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

I think this scrubbing of web resources by leftists is widespread. When Rev. Wright became an issue on the Sean Hannity Show, I looked up his church website, http://www.tucc.org/ . It had 10 items identified as its purpose. One of these 10 was American slave reparations. A couple weeks later the website had changed, and I couldn’t find it on the Wayback Machine ( http://www.archive.org/web/web.php) , even though it shows up. After this Justia story, I went back and checked again, and Wright’s church has a new site. If you search the old site, http://www.tucc.org/ , you will see what I mean. The new site, http://www.trinitychicago.org , shows that it was established Sep. 2008. Go figure. More hiding of Zero’s past.


177 posted on 10/26/2011 10:42:24 PM PDT by horsappl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson