Ever consider that rape really occurred? Sperm doesn’t just magically appear on a woman’s clothes?
The latest NYPost article conjectures that she was accustomed to trading sex for money, that she went to his room expecting that, and only cried foul when he refused to pay. Yes, there’s DNA evidence, but it only proves a sex act took place. You can’t prove rape (unconsented sex act) by DNA alone. You have to rely on testimony. And this testimonier is not terrible credible one way or another.
Just the way this was handled makes me think that someone is trying to pressure this man into submitting to someone else’s ideas.
Sure he had sex with the maid. Most women know what it takes to seduce the majority of men on this planet. She made sure there was going to be a DNA sample.
This guy isn’t the violent type. A single officer, wearing a suit could have gone up to him while he was in the lounge at the airport and quietly arrested him. No fuss, no cameras, bring him downtown, question and book him.
Instead, uniformed officers were used to remove him from the plane and parade him through the airport in handcuffs. The media was certainly given prior notice of the arrest and the charges.
All this could have been avoided if he had just gone along with someone’s plan about some country’s financial difficulties. Next time the punitive consequences will be a car crash and his wife or daughter will pay the price of his insubordinate behavior.
Presence of sperm is not, per se, proof of rape.
Believe it or not, despite what the FemiNazis claim, consensual sex does occur.
Really, it can. And it does.