Posted on 07/05/2011 7:39:19 PM PDT by RobinMasters
“Is it an absolute rule of law that if you are served with a subpoena, you must comply?”
Well if you are an individual and you get subpoened you have to show but govt agencies are going to blow it off with privacy excuses unless the Court (Judge) issues the subpoena. I believe Orly sent them a subpoena a month or so ago and Fuddy blew it off. I’m sure they will do it again unless the judge steps in and orders it.
We shall see what we shall see. I am tempted to think the HI Health Dept will reconfigure its letter response to the last, invalid, subpoena, then they go to court to battle it out.
Two points of confusion, tho.
1. Has Judge Lamberth yet told the parties they can proceed with discovery? The only scheduling order he issued was on 6/1 telling her to refile the complaint by the 14th, and the defendant had till today to file a dispositive motion. As we know, the SSA filed its motion for summary judgment on Friday (7/1/11). The time for Dr. Taitz to file an opposition is 14 days, IIRC, with another couple of days for SSA to file a reply to her opposition. Then Judge Lamberth has to read the arguments and issue an Order (grant/deny).
2. The dates on the subpoena confuse me. It appears it was signed/issued by a deputy clerk on July 5, 2011, and served by certified mail return receipt requested, also on July 5, 2011. SO, did the process server, who works for or with Dr. Taitz in CA, go to HI, get the subpoena issued today in the Clerk’s office and then send by certified mail to the HI AG? If she’d flown to HI from CA to get the subpoena issued, why not just go and serve it in person? Every govt office has an office with a individual who’s authorized to receive service.
Well well WELL well well.
Thanks for any and all pings.
Because Barry himself brought it out in the open for the public. No longer “private” matter!!!
I predict that the Hawaiian Dept of Health will simply ignore it and will not respond. It will simply be a stonewall at all levels.
“No it doesn’t. His qualifications were never in doubt, it is his eligibility that is.”
_________________________
You are both right and WRONG.
Indeed, the BC has nothing to do with qualifications, and I should have said “eligibility”.
His “QUALIFICATIONS”, however, ARE most certainly in doubt.
He has ZERO qualifications to be anything more then a Marxist community organizer.
Because Orly could not get a subpoena. She must have shown the judge something that piqued his interest.
Unless the one Obama released was a fake.
This almost certainly means they have finally FORGED a copy that will pass muster and inspection from all aspects paper, ink, typewriter, fonts etc.,and want to introduce it via this subpoena! I’m not sure who filed with the court to view it. Ann Obama supporter?
As you say, it didn’t exist - TILL NOW! So they want to “produce” it.
Thanks, FARS.
>>His “QUALIFICATIONS”, however, ARE most certainly in doubt.<<
.
Sheesh. You are one of those individuals who do not recognize “tongue-in-cheek” statements. Anyone who thinks that 0 has any qualifications to contribute to the welfare of this country must be an Obamanoid.
The scan 0009 image shows a letter being mailed to Orly FROM the US District court in Hawaii.
http://www.thepostemail.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/scan0009.jpg
I’d guess that this time, the exact letter of Hawaiian law was followed on the service of this subpoena so that Fuddy could not wiggle out.
“It looks somewhat like someone may have surreptitiously added the other vertical slash to “II I” at the end of Obama’s name.”
Do you have a theory on how that “someone” got in onto Orly Tatiz’s own web site?
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=23493
I too would have served it in person. I'm reading some of the OBot posts at FogButt, they are looking for the Hawaiian laws that covers serving subpoenas.
ButtFly Bilderberg - "The subpoena has to be served in accordance with the law in Hawaii. Some states require process servers be licensed and bonded, and registered with an office of civil process commission to act as a process server. Does anyone know whether that is the case in Hawaii? "
The servers should stay in Hawaii for a little while to ensure she can serve it again or get a Hawaiian process server if something goes wrong. ;-)
“Sheesh. You are one of those individuals who do not recognize “tongue-in-cheek” statements.”
___________________________________
Sorry, I was not implying that YOU meant that he was was qualified. We were talking about eligibility.
I think we all agree that he is the most Unqualified POTUS in history, and also likely that he was ineligible.
No don’t have a theory trolly. I just pointed out that there is separation or a larger gap between the 2nd and the last or 3rd vertical slash.
I’ve not seen the document....but your going to ask that question? You are aware of the constant allegations that Dr. Taitz’s site is virtually perpetually hacked and virus infected...yeah?
Her site has been hacked and “virused” so many times that any changes are SOP by her vast number of enemies.
Hope so that Duddy and Hawaii have no room for shuck n' jive this time. ;-0)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
