Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: starlifter

Someone in the Anthony household did because it was their duct tape. I am sure there would have been fingerprints and DNA had it not rotted in a swamp for six months, or if Casey would have told the police the truth after 31 days of a “missing child.” As the forensic folks said heat and water are the biggest enemies of forensic evidence. So 6 months in hot Florida weather plus a swamp caused the Hurricane Faye that worked well to hide valuable evidence that would have led to an easier case to prove. The Pros was awesome and Jeff Ashton was outstanding. The Jury not so much they never asked to look at ANY evidence.


48 posted on 07/07/2011 3:48:22 PM PDT by vicar7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: vicar7
Someone in the Anthony household doesn't mean Casey, does it?

Someone isn't enough to convict a specific person. They needed to prove it was her, and they couldn't or didn't.

As the forensic folks said heat and water are the biggest enemies of forensic evidence. So 6 months in hot Florida weather plus a swamp caused the Hurricane Faye that worked well to hide valuable evidence that would have led to an easier case to prove.

Yep. You're right. But strangely, the police refused to search, even though the lineman called three times on August 11th, 12th, and 13th. He gave his name. He offered to meet the police at the site, which was near the family home.

After three calls, the police came once, looked around for a few minutes, and then yelled at him for wasting their time.

In the exact spot the child's body was found in four months later.

Casey Anthony Trial: Roy Kronk testifies about Caylee Anthony's remains

http://www.wtsp.com/news/article/198927/19/Roy-Kronk-testifies-about-finding-Caylee-Anthonys-remains

Kronk said he called the Orange County Sheriff's Office when he got home to report possibly seeing a skull in the wooded area off Suburban Drive. He said he was told to call Crimeline, which he did, and he said he told Crimeline he saw an object that looked like it could have been a skull.

Kronk said the next day he returned to work as normal, but on Aug. 13, he called the Sheriff's Office again and was told an officer would meet him on Suburban Drive.

Kronk said two deputies arrived and he pointed to the area where he thought he saw an odd item. He emphasized that he did not say for sure the object was a skull. Records show the deputies found nothing at that time.

Kronk testified that the deputy was rude to him and dismissed his call. He said the deputy berated him for wasting his time.

When Kronk called the nonemergency 911 line, he told the dispatcher he saw something white, which appeared to be a skull, near a gray bag in an area near the Anthony family home.

Isn't it funny that the police refused to properly search an area that they knew this child was missing from?

I think she did it, but that the state didn't prove it and that there were enough holes in the evidence to drive a truck through.

The state of Florida let that baby's body lay there for 4 months. They could have had it in August, but they had too much to do.

51 posted on 07/07/2011 4:45:27 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: vicar7
“Someone in the Anthony household did” is lot different than the mother did.

Beware of bearing false witness, Vicar.

57 posted on 07/07/2011 5:19:19 PM PDT by starlifter (Pullum sapit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson