OK, we just see it differently and both laid out our reasoned arguments. It comes down to what you personally believe. You believe he was elected in spite of his ineligibility and I believe he was eligible. People disagree all the time. At least you have a logical reason for your beliefs.
Take care.
Oh? I never got that you were arguing he is eligible! I do feel dumb. I am not sure he isn’t eligible. I think all that is knowable is that there is evidence he had some problems with his status. The SS number, the stalled and phony BC’s, and other strange things.
I really don’t think the argument about “ Soros wouldn’t” helps the argument that he is eligible, though. But he certainly could be. The problem with the eligibility question is that we just don’t know.