Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Henrickson; BlessedMom92

“You may want to rethink or rephrase that, because that is the exact opposite of the gospel.”

How about something like: Since we can know God is for us, we need to concern ourselves more with “us” being for Him”?


10 posted on 07/23/2011 7:39:16 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: KrisKrinkle

Kris Kringle wrote: How about something like: Since we can know God is for us, we need to concern ourselves more with “us” being for Him”?

Yes, I like that, and that’s what I was trying to say.

Yes, Romans 8:28-29 is a favorite, but I think we tend to forget the phrase “for those who LOVE him.............” That phrase has caught my attention this year. Each of us should examine what it means to love him. Jesus did had much to say about that: “If you love me, you will obey my teachings.”


13 posted on 07/23/2011 8:29:09 PM PDT by BlessedMom92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson