Really? The argument is that Bachmann called someone and their opponent honorable is an endorsement? Good luck with that.
Why do you feel the need to make up what my argument is?
I didn't say that Bachmann endorsed McCain. I did say that Bachmann refused to endorse either candidate, saying that they were both honorable.
As I said, McCain is of course NOT honorable. So where's Bachmann's apology now for calling McCain "honorable" and for refusing to endorse Heyworth over McCain??
Well my argument is that Palin endorsed this loser very publicly. She should now tell us what she thinks of this. Apparently from your second reply, you believe that calling someone Honorable is the same as an endorsement. Otherwise, what is your point? She said a lie about his true character? She refused to endorse? A non endorsement is business as usual? None of these make any sense as an argumant against my statement.
It appears to me that you are in an all out race to somehow hit one of the candidates running that I like just to prove a point. It failed miserably.