Replies

I had no problem with Corsi until he decided his main attack on Obama would be birther arguments (literally, stuff he copied from birther websites). It's a distraction that reflects poorly on all Conservatives. Even if there were a small chance Obama is ineligible, it's been buried under a mountain of pseudo-legal arguments and tin foil hat conspiracy theories.

Corsi must realize by now that this is a losing argument that's been out of steam for at least a year. His swiftboating on Kerry was a compelling argument against Kerry's ability to lead. Now he's talking about pixels that look like a smiley face when you blow them up. He's become, in a word, pathetic. And I feel sorry for him.

Corsi has done volumes to expose the fraud that has been been passed off as fact.
He choose to expose the BC part of the puzzle yes. IMO it is a good thing. The BC is the ultimate most important evidence of all the other fraud. I believe the SS# numberS will be easier to prove the whole charade. In the end of Obama’s attempt to fundamentally transform us, the BC will be the most powerful bullet. He has fooled some with the forgeries and double speak, but the SS# leaves no way out for him.
Between the Selective Service with the SS# and all the problems with the date signed , the postal stamp etc are very damning. The addresses where he has lived that are associated with this SS# is rather impossible to deny. but the biggest problem for bo is the SS# according to official SSA letterhead, is that the number he has used and is still using has NEVER been issued. To me these facts along with the now infamous smiely face in Alvin's stamp out weigh any argument i have heard or read.
Put the evidence on one side of Lady Justice scale and put the non supplied defenses and I bet Lady Justice would fall right over. He is a FAKE.

Your characterization of Dr. Corsi’s argument is amusing. You zero in on one small argument and ignore the vast bulk of compelling evidence. Any intellectually honest person who looks into the details of the recently released “long form” document cannot help but conclude that it is a fraud. Personally I think one of the easiest to comprehend arguments was from the document experts who catalogued each type written letter and compared each example to the same letter from other parts of the document. The letter “t” for instance has at least half a dozen iterations that could not possibly have been produced on one typewriter.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=308397

I have read your posts on many threads and you have either an amazing ability to shut out all information that contradicts your point of view or you are an intellectually dishonest person. I tend to believe you are the latter. You are betrayed by your overuse of Alynski tactics mostly ridicule and insults. You sir, not Dr. Corsi is the one who “in a word” comes across as “pathetic”. Dr. Corsi has actually travelled the world and has put himself in harms way to research this subject. What have you done other than hurl insults from your computer keyboard?