Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: afraidfortherepublic
Certainly her sentance should have included the proviso that she should never own another pet, nor should she work in animal care.

I don't have a problem with someone being sentenced severly for cruely to animals. My problem is with the notion of "animal rights". Animals can be protected sufficiently without granting them equal citizenship or standing in the courts.

29 posted on 08/15/2011 5:57:55 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: GingisK

I’m not here to argue animal rights. I’m here to argue decency to animals and compassion. The perp in this case should lose HER right to impose her will on a poor, defenseless dog — especially since whe was working in the field at the time of her offense. It’s not as if she were a tiny child who had never been taught that you have to feed your dog!

Her offense is even more grave when you know how she earns her living.


30 posted on 08/15/2011 6:07:21 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson