[MrEdd]

It looked to me like he was trying at first to say that calling for execution for possession of child porn was extreme BECAUSE such things can get on your computer and transferred via your wireless account without your permission, or knowledge for that matter.

The child porn in question was not accidentally downloaded on the pervert's computer. It was a huge stash of physical books and magazines. Those don't just happen when you open the wrong email. And the topic was not execution, but unsupervised child visitation.

Follow the chain of comments from the article, to post three bringing up how hard it is to go without internet, to post six submitting that no internet or child custody is the alternative to righteous execution, to RobRoy's response at post sixteen.

At the end of the day, fantasizing over sex with children and indulging in building a huge collection of pictures of that aught to result in not being allowed near children unless there is someone sane there to protect the child.

Ever.

[ziravan]

"At the end of the day, fantasizing over sex with children and indulging in building a huge collection of pictures of that aught to result in not being allowed near children unless there is someone sane there to protect the child.

Ever."

Agreed. I do think though, that it is clear from Robroy's first post that he was making a general comment related to the general comments in the thread and wasn't speaking to the specific case linked.

.