Posted on 08/30/2011 10:16:41 AM PDT by markomalley
[ With this subject, one person’s affectionate gesture is another’s perverted act.
We need morality police... ]
No, we don’t need a state sponsored morality police. What we do need is to be able to comment and verbally chastise such acts in public as private citizens without fear of being charged with a “hate crime” for expressing our 1st amendment rights.
It is hard to believe what you describe could happen in the United States and it is imperative that you protect your family and protect your community.
If you are to protect your family you may be able to do a few things that will eradicate these evil and Godless people and lifestyle from your community.
First, pretend to befriend them and once you have their names call Child Protective Services and inform them that their children are being abused, perhaps even sexually.
Take pictures of these sodomites and post the pictures on the Internet and all around your community with a description of what these Sodomites are doing in your park.
When you see them fondeling each other in your park, you should call the police and file a complaint.
Finally, if you have their names, you can file suit against them and your city for violating your First Amendment Rights to freely practice your religion.
Be strong. If nothing else works, you should stand up in your park and at your loudest and strongest voice demand that the sodomites leave your park.
Move
I Agree
I don’t understand how a mother of seven has time to write such a long article. LOL
There was an article posted a while ago about some park in NYC that this group volunteered to clean up every weekend. One weekend they actually counted the condoms strewn everywhere, it was in the thousands. In one week. Of course the volunteer group was very non-judgmental and I’m not sure if the word “gay” was even mentioned in the article. And it isn’t a case of them being forced in the bushes because NYC is so hard on the gays, it’s just something they enjoy doing, having lots of sex with anonymous men.
Freegards
“Does she want the police to arrest gay couples who appear in public?”
If the presence of gay couples expressing themselves in her park offends her, it is in fact a violation of her First Amendment Right to practice her religion and the gays should be arrested.
Fags in bushes, almost an oxymoron, almost...
“They should all be destroyed like the demon-scum they are.”
Uh.....okaaaay?
I don’t like their openly flaunting that stuff especially in front of kids either.
But seriously?
All they need to do is control that childish need for PDA and no one will notice them nor care.
Problem is that with the ubiquitousness of the media and the state-sanctioned school curricula, move is a temporary solution at best. This garbage is coming to a suburb or small town near you...and sooner than you'd like to think.
Don't believe it? Remember what state Kathleen Sebelius was from...not exactly the urban core, was it?
It is time to stop retreating. Every time you think the problem is solved by pulling your kids out of public school and then ignoring the problem...you help perpetuate the issue. Every time you think the problem is solved by abandoning the urban for the countryside...you help perpetuate the problem. Why? Because by retreating from the cancer rather than fighting it, you just give it room to metastasize.
And note: I am not saying that you must enroll your kids in public school or move into the barrio. I am saying that you cannot ignore the problem just because you've done so. That is not a solution. It is just, at best, postponement.
They can’t because they are demon-possessed. Burning in hell for eternity is too good for their kind.
I want them to keep their consenting corruption in the privacy of their own home.If normal Americans can be penalized for refusing to provide services to those whose lifestyle choice they find repulsive —then WHY NOT penalize the reprobates for their repulsive and anti-social acts?
Yep, they are forcing it down your childrens throats at school and on TV. No “choice” will be given to the kids in this.
The problem is- at least in my observation - homosexuals sometimes are far more gratuitous in their public displays than most hetero “couples”. It is almost as if they are after the intentional shock-value.
But more importantly - and if one pays attention to the original writer’s situation - why should families have to worry about explaining such deviant and immoral “relationships” that their children seen at public parks?
There is absolutely NOTHING right about homosexuality, nor the public display of it (and no - I’m not a big fan of gratuitous displays of affection in such family-oriented public places either).
Hate Crime Legislation doesn’t trump the Constitution!
Unlike Canada and the UK. Freedom of speech is enshrined in our constitution. No mere federal law can trump that. You right to lawfully assemble in any public place and tell people what you think of them shall not be infringed.
normally i would suggest moving, as you’d take your tax dollars, and tax dollars of your children when they are of age, with you. libs/progressives depend on tax dollars to survive.
of course, not having enough tax revenue on the local level just means they’ll ask the state & then the fed... which will be more then happy to hand them more money... money they borrow from china...
so it’s come to a point where you cannot make something stop by voting with your feet... as they will get the money from you, even if you live 2000 miles away (ie: florida)
the only other option would be... to speak up. to explain why their behavior is not acceptable to you and your family... and not be willing to compromise any further. they will call you names, such is life.
after the name calling is when we will get to the solution stage
This is ultimately what we get when we “don’t care what two people do behind closed doors.”
Re-criminalize sodomy.
doesn't matter.
rhode island will still receive your money via federal taxes.
The writer has the First Amendment right not only to practice her religion by not having to view the undesirables expressing their perversion in her park but she also has the responsibility to publicly express her objections regarding the sodomites in her park and make sure they are banished from her park.
The author is worried about her children seeing two men rubbing elbows or two women rubbing each other on the back? Seriously? Odds are her children don’t even realize the sexual innuendos of these gestures. I don’t know about her children but when I was that age I paid attention to what I was doing at the park. What adults were doing was of no interest to me. If her children had seen two men or two women kissing or (Heaven help us) actually having sex in the park, that would have led to some awkward questions. The PDA she mentioned is pretty mild compared to what she could have seen.
I also have to wonder if the author would be as upset if her children witnessed hetero PDA in the park, which is also gross.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.