[SoJoCo]

You're still missing the point. The corporations you named spend enormous sums of money and human capital protecting their earned assets from federal robbery.

Successfully, too. So why do they need more tax breaks?

If there weren't any corporate taxes, they wouldn't need to have buildings stuffed with highly paid accountants, and could use that same money to purchase labor, equipment, expansion, etc. That means real jobs for regular working people, and greater economic activity all around.

No, they could lay off all those highly paid accountants and attorneys and pocket the money saved in profits. The one common denominator is that they pay no taxes and lay people off.

That in turn produces more in tax receipts to the US Treasury. Kennedy, Reagan, and GW Bush all proved that this works when implemented...

At tax rates higher than they are now. So again, if it isn't taxes that are the reason why they aren't hiring then what is it?

[Lazamataz]

Successfully, too. So why do [businesses] need more tax breaks?

To spend on Free Republic's liberal-zotting Viking Kitties.

[Windflier]

...they could lay off all those highly paid accountants and attorneys and pocket the money saved in profits. The one common denominator is that they pay no taxes and lay people off.

I think we're done here. You're rejecting all logic and reason in this discussion, and clinging to your liberal class warfare argument, which pegs you as a lib.

Enjoy your brief stay at Free Republic.