Posted on 09/07/2011 3:11:55 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell
Myself I am also aware that on the internet and even here will be some suggestive talk of violence, such of the type that I believe isn’t exactly what we need as it could be subtle instigators.
Of course we are angry but we are NOT going to evolve into a lynch mob.
Not at this moment at least.
Pssst: Sarah not running, though I do agree with your premise
I’m not sold on the idea of a non-violent response to violence. If the left wants a fight, and starts things with violence, they will find out very quickly who has the guns and who knows how to use them.
Can you give an example of the legal challenges you expect her to face?
I wasn’t aware that she had anything that she could be challenged on.
Tis true,
Some SEIU or teamster thug or two care to take a bat on someone with a CCW then they be fair game.
Hope it is on camera though.
“Compromise with leftist dogma is absolutely not acceptable. The destructive force of Marxist doctrine must be understood by all Americans. “
Too late! The sheep are fully lobotomized. We now live in “Alice in Wonderland” where nothing is as it seems. It takes work to find the truth. Not many are interested in nor can handle the truth.
We all know about not taking a knife to a gun fight, but taking a gun to one can be pretty chancy, too. Responding to violence with videos of the perps directly uploaded to the web seems more likely to succeed in the long run. Protecting the videographers would justify strong measures, though.
Obama is the Berlin Wall.
And it fell eventually.
If I'm at a TEA party rally, I always travel with my pal; I've never gone looking for trouble and I've not run from it, and won't begin because you axe me to take a beating and wait until someone is murdered.
You are a nit wit.
So was Jesus.
>>So was Jesus.<<
So you are Jesus?
Second; standing around holding hands and singing "Kumbaya" is not going to stop the Marxist thugs.
Limp-wristed responses are what is expected from the "weak".
It will not be initiated by those who have voiced a support for liberty but by those who oppose American style freedom. They are desperately seeking a conservative/Tea Party-labeled crisis to justify their over reaching, over reactive policies and actions.
Remember your last teachable moment with a liberal?
Just as their verbal defense of their parochial ideals always degrades into personal vitriol so to now that their puppet in chief has begun to fail, with arguments void of reason, violence is their only recourse.
Any one not aware or preparing for this is foolish.
>>So was Jesus.<<
So you are Jesus?
Sorry, you may not worship me. I seek only to follow my Master.
Nonviolence is an agressive tactic. It is in your face and invokes rage. Its power is in exposing the evil of violent men.
There have never been firm legal grounds for the countless suits filed against Sarah and the Tea Party.
Good point.
Not many are interested in nor can handle the truth.
The few who are brave enough to stand in the breach and receive the blows of ignorance and hate will stand tall though they may be beaten to the ground.
Responding to violence with videos of the perps directly uploaded to the web seems more likely to succeed in the long run.
That is the idea, to show the darkness of leftist hate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.