Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Outsourcing Defense Contracts to Unfriendly Governments
Pajamas Media ^ | September 14, 2011 | David Williams

Posted on 09/14/2011 6:41:51 PM PDT by Kaslin

Congress' choice: award a military contract to a Kansas company, or to a government-run Brazilian outfit.

The debt deal that President Obama signed on August 2 has sparked an important conversation about aggressive spending cuts in order to avoid a financial crisis. As part of that debt deal, Congress has formed the super committee to make recommendations to cut spending. The Department of Defense will surely have many decisions ahead of them as they are faced with the likely reality that defense programs may be subject to significant cuts from the committee.

Recognizing the need for light air support, the Department is expected to soon announce its decision on an aircraft to meet its light air support needs. This procurement decision is a case study in what the Department of Defense should do to protect taxpayer dollars. Two competitors have bid on the plane: Embraer, based in Brazil; and Hawker Beechcraft, based in Kansas.

Embraer is a Brazilian company with a strong history of opposing international security efforts by the United States. If Embraer is selected, there is a strong likelihood that taxpayer dollars will be put at risk. Normally the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA) would not take up the issue of a defense procurement project based upon the country in which an aircraft is being built, but considering the unique nature of the arrangement Embraer has with the Brazilian government, a much closer look is warranted.

The Brazilian government has a “golden share” in Embraer, which gives the government a majority share of the company. This allows the Brazilian government to make decisions for the company that cannot be stopped by other shareholders. The golden share also allows the Brazilian government to stop, slow, or alter production of the company’s products. While Embraer claims that the government cannot interfere in business decisions, history shows that as far back as World War II, other foreign governments that have not agreed with U.S. policy have interfered with products being built for American defense machinery.

As the U.S. works towards defeating its enemies abroad, we need to be aware of those who seek to profit from America’s defense. Overdependence on nations that spend significant political capital opposing American foreign policy and national security is counterintuitive — and dangerous.

If the Department of Defense selects the Embraer plane in the coming weeks, taxpayers will be giving more than $150 million to a foreign government at a time when there are no resources to spare. Awarding this contract to Hawker Beechcraft would keep $5 billion in the American economy.

The right decision for taxpayers and for our national security is Beechcraft. Their aircraft appears to be less risky, a superior product that will meet the light air support requirements. And it can never potentially have production stopped or stalled because of international disputes.

Taxpayers understand that it is necessary to spend money to defend the country. What they don’t understand is why the Department of Defense would put tax dollars and national security at risk by choosing a foreign contractor that could threaten both our physical and fiscal well-being.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: defensecontracts; outsourcing

1 posted on 09/14/2011 6:41:53 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Unfriendly governments?Unfriendly to whom?Certainly not the Democrats who have a history of bribe money from some pretty unsavory countries.


2 posted on 09/14/2011 6:47:31 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A couple of points
1. Embraer Air aircraft is already in service doing the job throughout Central and Southern America, H/B aircraft (1) is not certified for any portion of the contract.
2. H/B is 50% Canadian and will assemble the aircraft in Mexico. Embraer Air will assemble the scheduled US buy in Florida.
3. H/B could not conduct the fly off without a maintenance team of 50+ because the aircraft had never operated on a undeveloped airfield. Embraer Air brought 2 mechanics. It is operational in the drug war in South America.
Nice hit job from H/B. Any of this information is readily available on the internet.


3 posted on 09/14/2011 7:03:00 PM PDT by Keyga8tor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This particular contract is to supply light attack aircraft to the Afghan Air Force. Odd that the author waves the bloody shirt of US national security.

Further, if he was really certain Brazil is an unfriendly country shouldn't he be trashing Boeing for trying to sell the F/A-18 to the Brazilian Air Force?

4 posted on 09/14/2011 7:08:12 PM PDT by paddles ("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What are the two aircraft types? Beech does make a fine machine.


5 posted on 09/14/2011 8:00:30 PM PDT by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson