Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ari-freedom

Even in liberal CA, the majority of Black people voted against gay “marriage.”

The GOP needs to avoid liberal lite candidates. Why would a liberal vote for a “moderate” when they can vote for a liberal. However, as you have shown, liberals, who are social conservatives might vote for a Republican BECAUSE he is a social conservative.

The GOP establishment, as well as registered GOP voters in the primaries, need to look at history:

“Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), told CNA that the pro-life issue motivated a lot of voters. From the NRLC’s perspective, there were “very, very substantial” improvements in about 65 House seats.

“Either a hardcore pro-abortion candidate was defeated by a pro-life challenger, or someone with a mixed record, like on the health care bill, was replaced.”

The bulk of the candidates, about 40, were “hardcore pro-abortion people” who voted for pro-life legislation “seldom if ever.”’

more http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/pro-life-leaders-reflect-on-gains-in-congress-fallout-from-health-care-law/

So why be afraid to back a strong social conservative?


7 posted on 10/02/2011 10:49:12 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Sun

“So why be afraid to back a strong social conservative?”

because the more secular fiscal conservatives usually have more money.


8 posted on 10/02/2011 11:05:34 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I'm a heartless conservative because I love this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson