Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Rush Limbaugh sleeps while Herman Cain attacks free market and federalism
10-23-2011 | JOHN W K

Posted on 10/23/2011 4:57:25 PM PDT by JOHN W K

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
To: JOHN W K

Hey John...GO AWAY!!


101 posted on 10/23/2011 6:05:18 PM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

I agree. A sales tax is at the point of sales only.


102 posted on 10/23/2011 6:06:31 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

A national sales tax is not going to pass Congress.


103 posted on 10/23/2011 6:07:05 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Isn’t that already happening, though, with the supposed “exemption for the poor”? Obviously that only affects the income tax, but I still see seeds of the possibility of class warfare through taxation there.

Also, given recent history, what (aside from elections or outright bankruptcy) is to prevent Congress from just spending $2 trillion or more rather than raising taxes?

Oh well, as long as Congress exists, I guess we’ll have to accept some risk!


104 posted on 10/23/2011 6:08:09 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
You wrote:

I hate to be snippy, but you are simply factually ignorant in every post you’ve made in this thread. Cain gets rid of a 70 thousand word code in his 999 plan and replaces it with a simple flat income tax piece.

Exactly! Herman Cain keep alive Congress' power to lay and collect taxes calculated from profits, gains, and other "incomes".

The only way to drive a stake in the heart of this wretched tax is adding words to our Constitution such as:

The Sixteenth Amendment is hereby repealed and Congress is henceforth forbidden to lay ``any`` tax or burden calculated from profits, gains, interest, salaries, wages, tips, inheritances or any other lawfully realized money

JWK

105 posted on 10/23/2011 6:11:11 PM PDT by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

No, I’m not content to stick with the status quo, which is why I want the entire system thrown out and the EXTREMELY simple 9-9-9 plan implemented.

You’re talking a Constitution Convention with a new amendment passed to completely repeal the existing tax structure. 9-9-9 falls under enough fire b/c some people don’t think it’s revenue neutral. Your idea is DEFINITELY not revenue neutral, so how do you expect to sell it?


106 posted on 10/23/2011 6:11:57 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K
I've read your responses and understand your desire to return our government to its original constitutional limits in regards to taxation and spending. I think most of us would agree with this, though we might disagree on how to get there. Here's my question: why did you single out Limbaugh and Cain in your vanity when none of the candidates or pundits have proposed what you want? Why wasn't your article titled "What the Constitution says about Taxation" instead of "Vanity: Rush Limbaugh sleeps while Herman Cain attacks free market and federalism"?
107 posted on 10/23/2011 6:14:57 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy
You wrote:

Think what you will of a national sales tax, but it's not "another" or even a new power. You pay a national sales tax every time you buy a gallon of gasoline or a tire (just to name two). The federal government has imposed excise taxes on goods and services for virtually our entire history.

There is a vast difference between an excise tax being placed upon “judiciously selected” articles of consumption as our founding fathers intended from that of an national retail sales tax which violates the very intentions of our founding fathers for any general tax laid among the States, and which they specifically intended to be laid by the rule of apportionment.

JWK

“The proportion of taxes are fixed by the number of inhabitants, and not regulated by the extent of the territory, or fertility of soil” 3 Elliot`s, 243, “Each state will know, from its population, its proportion of any general tax” ___ Mr. George Nicholas, during the ratification debates of our Constitution.

108 posted on 10/23/2011 6:19:44 PM PDT by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

He is STILL a hypocrit.
And a pathetic charlatan.

From Business Insider‘s Zeke Miller:

Newly-minted GOP front-runner Herman Cain is best known for his 9-9-9 tax plan, but it turns out he opposed a key component of it — a national sales tax — less than a year ago.

In a column posted on the websites of a number of conservative publications, including The Daily Caller, Cain wrote that “the worst idea is a proposed national sales tax, which is a disguised VAT (value added tax) on top of everything we already pay in federal taxes.”

Miller goes on to publish responses from the Cain campaign that indicate the candidate’s consistent support for “fair/flat” taxes, and that he was referencing a national sales tax in addition to our current tax code, but he needn’t have gone to the trouble. Cain was anchovy-and-onion explicit about that in the very same op-ed piece, including the portion that Miller blockquoted: (emphasis mine)

The worst idea is a proposed national sales tax, which is a disguised VAT (value added tax) on top of everything we already pay in federal taxes.

…A national retail sales tax on top of all the confusing and unfair taxes we have today is insane!

…The third reason the national retail sales tax on top of all the taxes we already pay is a bad idea, is that there is already proposed legislation that replaces all of the federal taxes we pay. It replaces all current revenue. It supercharges our national economic growth, and puts the power of taxation back into the hands of the people who spend their money.

It’s called the Fair Tax. It’s as easy to understand as ABC!

Miller is correct in pointing out that one of the arguments that Cain used against the VAT, that it gives the government a brand-new slippery slope of tax revenue, is currently being deployed by his opponents.

There are, of course, huge problems with the 9-9-9 plan (it strongly resembles a tax plan from a videogame, it’s the work of dyslexic Satan, it shifts the tax burden onto the poor, it encourages the purchase of used milk), and it has as much chance of passing Congress as a monetary system based on unicorn farts, but it isn’t contradicted by Cain’s op-ed from November.

Only time will tell how Herman Cain stands up under the glare of the frontrunner’s spotlight, and there are many legitimate criticisms to be made of the candidate’s steady stream of wild-and-crazy policy pronouncements (although I must confess that my own comically liberal reaction to Cain’s electrified border fence remarks was to think to myself, “Shouldn’t that ‘THIS WILL KILL YOU’ sign be bilingual?”). There’s no reason to create them out of thin air.


109 posted on 10/23/2011 6:20:14 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

How could I possibly be misleading by quoting word for word Herman Cain?

(Herman Cain: T*H*E New Voice Nov 21, 2010)

http://www.economicfreedomcoalition.com/news/press-opinion.asp?id=32

“Giving the administration and Congress another tool to tax us and confuse us is like giving an alcoholic a key to the liquor store with no supervision, only to discover that he locks the door after he is safely inside.

A national retail sales tax on top of all the confusing and unfair taxes we have today is insane! It gives the out-of-control bureaucrats and politicians in denial one more tool to lie, deceive, manipulate and destroy this country.”


110 posted on 10/23/2011 6:22:27 PM PDT by TexMom7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

Oh that crazy constitution.
I don’t think Cain even gives it a second thought.


111 posted on 10/23/2011 6:27:34 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
You wrote:

A national retail sales tax on top of all the confusing and unfair taxes we have today is insane!

Of course it is. That's why Cain is proposing not to put a National Sales Tax on top of all the confusing and unfair taxes we have today but to eliminate all of the confusing and unfair taxes we have today and replace all of them with a simple 999 tax. Is that so hard to understand?

Last time I checked Herman Cain’s plan, and he does change it from day to day, he is promoting a national retail sales tax, in addition to taxing corporate profits and gains, and also proposes to tax the wages which working people earn, except for those who live in one of his privileged “opportunity zones”.

How sweet of Herman Cain to be so “progressive”!

JWK

112 posted on 10/23/2011 6:29:06 PM PDT by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Your wrote:

Try actually READING what Cain said, not just put your own emotion based spin on it. 9-9-9 replaces, it does not add to, the existing tax code.

Wrong! Herman Cain proposes to keep taxes on corporate profits and gain alive, keep taxes on “incomes” alive which includes taxes on the wages working people earn, and on top of all this he proposes a new tax, a national retail sales tax which would tax the food a mother buys to feed her child, taxes the clothing she purchases to cloth that child, taxes the fuel used to heat that child’s room during winter months, taxes the medicine a mother needs to care for a sickly child, and then our beloved Herman Cain would tax the coffin used to bury her child because she simply could not afford his national sales tax on every imaginable necessity of life in addition to Mr. Cain taxing the bread she earns when selling the property she has in her labor! Of course, if she lives in one of Herman Cain’s privileged “opportunity zones”, she gets a free ride!

JWK

113 posted on 10/23/2011 6:38:58 PM PDT by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K
Screaming a lie louder does not magically change your fiction to fact.

Perhaps in the future you might try actually reading what Cain wrote BEFORE posting a completely ignorant tirade about it.

114 posted on 10/23/2011 6:44:10 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

“...taxes the medicine a mother needs to care for a sickly child, and then our beloved Herman Cain would tax the coffin used to bury her child because she simply could not afford his national sales tax on every imaginable necessity of life...”

I’m picturing Herman Cain twirling his mustache whilst tying the poor woman’s older daughter to the railroad tracks!

Woo-hoo! I can hardly wait til the next installment.


115 posted on 10/23/2011 6:47:39 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Mass murder and cannibalism are the twin sacraments of socialism - "Who-whom?"-Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
You wrote:

What so many detractors of Cain's plan fail to realize, is that it's politically impossible for Congress to raise a tax rate that affects EVERYONE.

Are you talking about something like the “Temporary Victory Tax” of 1942 levied upon individual’s net incomes to fund the war effort, and is still very much in effect to this very day? As I recall it started off with something like a 2 or 3 percent rate.

As to the sales tax which you seem to favor, it is self evident that such a tax is the darling of depots and political schemers who dream of a tax which may constantly be increased in such small increments, say a quarter of a percent at a time “to feed the starving children” which would avoid significant outcry, that the proverbial frog [the American Taxpayer} will eventually be cooked before attempting its escape.

JWK

116 posted on 10/23/2011 6:49:18 PM PDT by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K
Are you talking about something like the “Temporary Victory Tax” of 1942 levied upon individual’s net incomes to fund the war effort, and is still very much in effect to this very day? As I recall it started off with something like a 2 or 3 percent rate.

No, I'm talking about a tax which is levied against every income earning American, at precisely the same percentage. You can't prove to me that any modern day congress has the courage to raise the rate on such a tax.

As to the sales tax which you seem to favor, it is self evident that such a tax is the darling of depots and political schemers who dream of a tax which may constantly be increased in such small increments

What despots fund their government through a consumption tax (not a VAT)?

Again, as with the case of the flat 9% income tax, a consumption tax would also be politically impossible to touch, because it affects EVERYONE, equally. That is a level of transparency that's been purposely engineered out of our current tax law.

Our current tax regime is the stuff of demons and despots. It's been constantly tinkered with, to the detriment of the productive class in this country. Fix your weapon on the real enemy, friend.

117 posted on 10/23/2011 7:02:08 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K

Sorry you worked so hard to write this BS, but you need to re-evaluate your position.


118 posted on 10/23/2011 7:06:07 PM PDT by Randy Larsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN W K
“Cain gets rid of a 70 thousand word code”
Not quite accurate.

By the way, if you go to the US Government Printing Office ( www.gpo.gov ), you can order a complete set of Title 26 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (that's the part written by the IRS), all twenty volumes of it, at the bargain price of $974, shipping included.

According to the US Government Printing Office, it's 13,458 pages in total. The full text of Title 26 of the United States Code (the part written by Congress—available for an additional $179) is a mere 3,387 printed pages, bringing the adjusted gross page count to 16,845.

The number of words has been left as an exercise for the student.

119 posted on 10/23/2011 7:07:22 PM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (Proudly casting a heavy carbon footprint as I clean my guns ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: marty60
You wrote:

He is STILL a hypocrit.
And a pathetic charlatan.
From Business Insider‘s Zeke Miller:

Agreed!

The truth is, when it comes to taxes Herman Cain is all over the map and keeps changing his crap. See Don’t be VAT stupid in which he decries a national sales tax. Then, when time passes, he comes out in favor of the “fairtax”. But when he sees too many people objecting to putting every American family on a monthly government subsistence check under its family consumption entitlement, and that the fairtax must be put into operation before the 16th Amendment will be repealed [which the people aren’t buying], then Cain comes up with some new crap, the 9-9-9 plan, and goes back to a national sales tax along with Empowerment Zones, which allows people within his geographical “designated empowerment zones” to be relieved from the 9-9-9 taxes. And then, he changes his “empowerment zones” to “opportunity zones“ for public relations purposes. But the bottom line is, what part of our Constitution is it that Herman Cain believes allows preferential tax treatment based on geographical location. I know Obama believes in preferential treatment as practiced under his Solyndra green jobs deal which he used to plunder our federal treasury. Seem as though Cain and Obama have something very much in common when it comes to using the force of the federal government to grant preferential treatment and unequal tax law.

JWK

120 posted on 10/23/2011 7:08:51 PM PDT by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson